Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Samsung PL200
91 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
94 Imaging
37 Features
22 Overall
31
Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Samsung PL200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 218g - 110 x 64 x 28mm
- Announced January 2014
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 31-217mm (F3.3-5.5) lens
- 170g - 100 x 60 x 21mm
- Released July 2010
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Samsung PL200 Overview
Here, we will be reviewing the Olympus TG-850 iHS versus Samsung PL200, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Olympus and Samsung. The image resolution of the TG-850 iHS (16MP) and the PL200 (14MP) is pretty close and both cameras provide the identical sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe TG-850 iHS was revealed 3 years after the PL200 which is a fairly big difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before going into a complete comparison, here is a short overview of how the TG-850 iHS grades versus the PL200 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Samsung PL200 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS & Samsung PL200. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus TG-850 iHS Gallery & Samsung PL200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-850 iHS over the Samsung PL200
| TG-850 iHS | PL200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2014 |  | July 2010 | Newer by 43 months |
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting screen |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung PL200 over the Olympus TG-850 iHS
| PL200 | TG-850 iHS |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus TG-850 iHS and Samsung PL200
| TG-850 iHS | PL200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | No manual focus | ||
| Screen size | 3" |  | 3" | Same screen measurements |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Lacking Touch screen |
Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Samsung PL200 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to travel with your camera often, you will want to factor its weight and dimensions. The Olympus TG-850 iHS has got physical measurements of 110mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") along with a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs) while the Samsung PL200 has dimensions of 100mm x 60mm x 21mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.8") and a weight of 170 grams (0.37 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus TG-850 iHS versus Samsung PL200 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you use at that moment. Here is a front view size comparison of the TG-850 iHS against the PL200.
Using size and weight, the portability rating of the TG-850 iHS and PL200 is 91 and 94 respectively.
Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Samsung PL200 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, its difficult to picture the gap in sensor dimensions merely by researching technical specs. The picture below will help give you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the TG-850 iHS and PL200.
As you have seen, the 2 cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit different resolution. You can expect the Olympus TG-850 iHS to result in greater detail because of its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will enable you to crop shots way more aggressively. The newer TG-850 iHS should have an edge in sensor tech.
Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Samsung PL200 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Samsung PL200 Specifications
| Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS | Samsung PL200 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model type | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS | Samsung PL200 |
| Type | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2014-01-29 | 2010-07-21 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | TruePic VII | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4616 x 3464 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 125 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 21-105mm (5.0x) | 31-217mm (7.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.7 | f/3.3-5.5 |
| Macro focusing distance | - | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 460 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen tech | TFT LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 1/2 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1500 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 7.0 frames per sec | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 4.60 m |
| Flash modes | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow sync |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | H.264, Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 218g (0.48 lb) | 170g (0.37 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 110 x 64 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") | 100 x 60 x 21mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 330 shots | - |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | LI-50B | BP70A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 sec, 12 sec, Custom Self-Timer (1-30 sec start timer, 1-10 pictures, 1-3 sec interval)) | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | SD/SDHC'/MMC, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Launch pricing | $250 | $0 |
