Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Samsung WB350F
91 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
90 Imaging
40 Features
46 Overall
42
Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Samsung WB350F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 218g - 110 x 64 x 28mm
- Announced January 2014
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 276g - 114 x 65 x 25mm
- Released January 2014
Photography Glossary Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Samsung WB350F Overview
In this write-up, we are evaluating the Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Samsung WB350F, one being a Waterproof and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Olympus and Samsung. The image resolution of the TG-850 iHS (16MP) and the WB350F (16MP) is fairly well matched and they feature the same exact sensor size (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe TG-850 iHS was brought out within a month of the WB350F so they are both of a similar generation. Both of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving straight into a thorough comparison, below is a quick view of how the TG-850 iHS matches up vs the WB350F in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Samsung WB350F Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS and Samsung WB350F. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus TG-850 iHS Gallery and Samsung WB350F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-850 iHS over the Samsung WB350F
| TG-850 iHS | WB350F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting display |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB350F over the Olympus TG-850 iHS
| WB350F | TG-850 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Dial accurate focusing | ||
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus TG-850 iHS and Samsung WB350F
| TG-850 iHS | WB350F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2014 |  | January 2014 | Similar generation |
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent display size |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 460k | Equal display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen |
Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Samsung WB350F Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to carry your camera often, you will want to consider its weight and dimensions. The Olympus TG-850 iHS features physical dimensions of 110mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") along with a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs) and the Samsung WB350F has dimensions of 114mm x 65mm x 25mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.0") having a weight of 276 grams (0.61 lbs).
Check the Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Samsung WB350F in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are working with at the time. Underneath is the front view overall size comparison of the TG-850 iHS vs the WB350F.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the TG-850 iHS and WB350F is 91 and 90 respectively.
Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Samsung WB350F Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is very hard to picture the difference between sensor sizing only by reading through specifications. The photograph here will help give you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the TG-850 iHS and WB350F.
Plainly, each of these cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing and the exact same megapixels so you should expect similar quality of pictures however you would want to factor the production date of the products into consideration.
Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Samsung WB350F Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Samsung WB350F Specifications
| Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS | Samsung WB350F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS | Samsung WB350F |
| Category | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2014-01-29 | 2014-01-07 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | TruePic VII | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 4:3 |
| Max resolution | 4616 x 3464 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 125 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 21-105mm (5.0x) | 23-483mm (21.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.5-5.7 | f/2.8-5.9 |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 460 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Screen tech | TFT LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 1/2s | 16s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 7.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | H.264, Motion JPEG | - |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 218 gr (0.48 pounds) | 276 gr (0.61 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 110 x 64 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") | 114 x 65 x 25mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 330 pictures | - |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | LI-50B | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 sec, 12 sec, Custom Self-Timer (1-30 sec start timer, 1-10 pictures, 1-3 sec interval)) | - |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch pricing | $250 | $260 |