Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Sony H300
91 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
63 Imaging
45 Features
37 Overall
41
Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Sony H300 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 218g - 110 x 64 x 28mm
- Revealed January 2014
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-875mm (F3-5.9) lens
- 590g - 130 x 95 x 122mm
- Introduced February 2014
Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Sony H300 Overview
Let's look closer at the Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Sony H300, former being a Waterproof while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Olympus and Sony. The image resolution of the TG-850 iHS (16MP) and the H300 (20MP) is fairly close and both cameras provide the identical sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe TG-850 iHS was introduced very close to the H300 and they are both of a similar age. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus TG-850 iHS being a Compact camera and the Sony H300 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before diving right into a in depth comparison, here is a brief summation of how the TG-850 iHS scores vs the H300 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Sony H300 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H300. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus TG-850 iHS Gallery & Sony H300 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-850 iHS over the Sony H300
TG-850 iHS | H300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display |
Reasons to pick Sony H300 over the Olympus TG-850 iHS
H300 | TG-850 iHS |
---|
Common features in the Olympus TG-850 iHS and Sony H300
TG-850 iHS | H300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2014 | February 2014 | Same age | |
Focus manually | No manual focusing | |||
Display size | 3" | 3" | Same display measurements | |
Display resolution | 460k | 460k | Equal display resolution | |
Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Neither has Touch display |
Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Sony H300 Physical Comparison
If you are intending to lug around your camera regularly, you will have to consider its weight and measurements. The Olympus TG-850 iHS has physical measurements of 110mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs) and the Sony H300 has proportions of 130mm x 95mm x 122mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 4.8") along with a weight of 590 grams (1.30 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Sony H300 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Following is a front view proportions comparison of the TG-850 iHS and the H300.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the TG-850 iHS and H300 is 91 and 63 respectively.
Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Sony H300 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, its difficult to imagine the difference in sensor measurements purely by looking through specifications. The visual here might give you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the TG-850 iHS and H300.
To sum up, both of those cameras feature the identical sensor size but different MP. You can anticipate the Sony H300 to result in extra detail using its extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also let you crop images way more aggressively.
Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Sony H300 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Sony H300 Specifications
Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H300 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H300 |
Category | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2014-01-29 | 2014-02-13 |
Body design | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic VII | Bionz(R) |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4616 x 3464 | 5152 x 3864 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 125 | 80 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 21-105mm (5.0x) | 25-875mm (35.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.5-5.7 | f/3-5.9 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 460 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen tech | TFT LCD | Clear Photo LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 201 thousand dot |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 1/2 secs | 30 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1500 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 7.0 frames per sec | 1.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | - | 8.80 m |
Flash modes | - | Auto, Flash On, Slow Synchro, Flash Off, Advanced Flash |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30p) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video format | H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Yes | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 218 grams (0.48 lb) | 590 grams (1.30 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 110 x 64 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") | 130 x 95 x 122mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 4.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 330 images | 350 images |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | LI-50B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 sec, 12 sec, Custom Self-Timer (1-30 sec start timer, 1-10 pictures, 1-3 sec interval)) | Yes (Off, 10 sec, 2 sec, portrait1, portrait2) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick PRO Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch cost | $250 | $249 |