Olympus TG-860 vs Olympus VG-110
91 Imaging
40 Features
42 Overall
40
97 Imaging
35 Features
20 Overall
29
Olympus TG-860 vs Olympus VG-110 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 224g - 110 x 64 x 28mm
- Revealed February 2015
- Later Model is Olympus TG-870
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 27-108mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 105g - 92 x 54 x 20mm
- Launched February 2011
Olympus TG-860 vs Olympus VG-110 Overview
Here, we will be evaluating the Olympus TG-860 versus Olympus VG-110, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Ultracompact and both of them are designed by Olympus. There exists a noticeable gap between the sensor resolutions of the TG-860 (16MP) and VG-110 (12MP) but both cameras provide the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe TG-860 was released 4 years after the VG-110 which is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras feature the same body design (Ultracompact).
Before we go right into a more detailed comparison, here is a short overview of how the TG-860 matches up against the VG-110 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus TG-860 vs Olympus VG-110 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 & Olympus VG-110. The complete galleries are available at Olympus TG-860 Gallery & Olympus VG-110 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-860 over the Olympus VG-110
TG-860 | VG-110 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2015 | February 2011 | More modern by 49 months | |
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen size | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-110 over the Olympus TG-860
VG-110 | TG-860 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus TG-860 and Olympus VG-110
TG-860 | VG-110 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Lack of manual focus | |||
Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Absent Touch friendly screen |
Olympus TG-860 vs Olympus VG-110 Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to carry around your camera frequently, you'll need to think about its weight and volume. The Olympus TG-860 features external measurements of 110mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") with a weight of 224 grams (0.49 lbs) and the Olympus VG-110 has sizing of 92mm x 54mm x 20mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.8") with a weight of 105 grams (0.23 lbs).
See the Olympus TG-860 versus Olympus VG-110 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are using during that time. Following is a front view measurement comparison of the TG-860 against the VG-110.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the TG-860 and VG-110 is 91 and 97 respectively.
Olympus TG-860 vs Olympus VG-110 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is very difficult to visualise the gap between sensor sizes simply by looking at specs. The pic underneath will offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the TG-860 and VG-110.
All in all, both of the cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit not the same resolution. You can count on the Olympus TG-860 to resolve greater detail as a result of its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will let you crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The fresher TG-860 is going to have a benefit with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus TG-860 vs Olympus VG-110 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus TG-860 vs Olympus VG-110 Specifications
Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 | Olympus VG-110 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 | Olympus VG-110 |
Category | Waterproof | Ultracompact |
Revealed | 2015-02-06 | 2011-02-08 |
Physical type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic VII | TruePic III |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3968 x 2976 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
Minimum native ISO | 125 | 80 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 21-105mm (5.0x) | 27-108mm (4.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.5-5.7 | f/2.9-6.5 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3" | 2.7" |
Resolution of screen | 460 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 7.0 frames per sec | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 4.00 m (at ISO 1600) | 4.70 m |
Flash settings | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, off, LED illuminator | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (60p) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video file format | H.264 | MPEG-4 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Yes | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 224g (0.49 pounds) | 105g (0.23 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 110 x 64 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") | 92 x 54 x 20mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 images | 170 images |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | Li-50B | LI-70B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD/SDHC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch price | $279 | $150 |