Olympus TG-860 vs Olympus VH-515
91 Imaging
40 Features
42 Overall
40
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/042ab/042ab9bda5359b24c15525e105c8dbb85792e213" alt="Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 front Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/77ce5/77ce56bcec511e7aab885ff155154eb3bca39025" alt="Olympus VH-515 front Olympus VH-515 front"
95 Imaging
36 Features
34 Overall
35
Olympus TG-860 vs Olympus VH-515 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 224g - 110 x 64 x 28mm
- Announced February 2015
- Later Model is Olympus TG-870
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 152g - 102 x 60 x 21mm
- Announced August 2012
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus TG-860 vs Olympus VH-515 Overview
Lets look a little more in depth at the Olympus TG-860 vs Olympus VH-515, former is a Waterproof while the other is a Small Sensor Compact and both of them are produced by Olympus. There exists a sizable gap among the image resolutions of the TG-860 (16MP) and VH-515 (12MP) but both cameras provide the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
The TG-860 was introduced 2 years after the VH-515 which is a fairly significant difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus TG-860 being a Ultracompact camera and the Olympus VH-515 being a Compact camera.
Before going into a full comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the TG-860 scores vs the VH-515 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus TG-860 vs Olympus VH-515 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 & Olympus VH-515. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus TG-860 Gallery & Olympus VH-515 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-860 over the Olympus VH-515
TG-860 | VH-515 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | February 2015 | ![]() | August 2012 | More modern by 30 months |
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Reasons to pick Olympus VH-515 over the Olympus TG-860
VH-515 | TG-860 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus TG-860 and Olympus VH-515
TG-860 | VH-515 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | No manual focus | ||
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal display measurements |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 460k | The same display resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Missing selfie screen |
Olympus TG-860 vs Olympus VH-515 Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to carry around your camera frequently, you are going to need to take into account its weight and measurements. The Olympus TG-860 enjoys exterior measurements of 110mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") along with a weight of 224 grams (0.49 lbs) and the Olympus VH-515 has proportions of 102mm x 60mm x 21mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs).
Check out the Olympus TG-860 vs Olympus VH-515 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you choose at the time. Underneath is a front view size comparison of the TG-860 and the VH-515.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0713a/0713a33388fa6a13514bd823ef404fb8dd82f4d0" alt="Olympus TG-860 vs Olympus VH-515 size comparison Olympus TG-860 vs Olympus VH-515 size comparison"
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the TG-860 and VH-515 is 91 and 95 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3a263/3a263d4e8b59c2a2bc7755cf653ebf2cae4bc430" alt="Olympus TG-860 vs Olympus VH-515 top view buttons comparison Olympus TG-860 vs Olympus VH-515 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus TG-860 vs Olympus VH-515 Sensor Comparison
Normally, its difficult to picture the difference in sensor sizes simply by viewing specifications. The pic below should give you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the TG-860 and VH-515.
To sum up, the two cameras have the same sensor dimensions but different resolution. You can expect to see the Olympus TG-860 to provide you with more detail using its extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also help you crop images a bit more aggressively. The newer TG-860 should have an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7bb21/7bb213640e8cac38008871594842845a8a399cce" alt="Olympus TG-860 vs Olympus VH-515 sensor size comparison Olympus TG-860 vs Olympus VH-515 sensor size comparison"
Olympus TG-860 vs Olympus VH-515 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/df091/df0911a09e89a7869a6e06ab3fe25d33d072cd16" alt="Olympus TG-860 vs Olympus VH-515 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus TG-860 vs Olympus VH-515 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus TG-860 vs Olympus VH-515 Specifications
Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 | Olympus VH-515 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 | Olympus VH-515 |
Type | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2015-02-06 | 2012-08-21 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic VII | TruePic III+ |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
Lowest native ISO | 125 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 21-105mm (5.0x) | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
Max aperture | f/3.5-5.7 | f/2.8-6.5 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 460 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 7.0 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.00 m (at ISO 1600) | 4.70 m |
Flash options | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, off, LED illuminator | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (60p) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Yes | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 224 gr (0.49 lbs) | 152 gr (0.34 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 110 x 64 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") | 102 x 60 x 21mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 images | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | Li-50B | LI-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Cost at release | $279 | $648 |