Olympus TG-860 vs Olympus VR-330
91 Imaging
40 Features
42 Overall
40
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/042ab/042ab9bda5359b24c15525e105c8dbb85792e213" alt="Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 front Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b65f6/b65f6bde8fac08d49d3f08ec42b6ae4217524297" alt="Olympus VR-330 front Olympus VR-330 front"
94 Imaging
37 Features
38 Overall
37
Olympus TG-860 vs Olympus VR-330 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 224g - 110 x 64 x 28mm
- Announced February 2015
- Later Model is Olympus TG-870
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Released February 2011
- Older Model is Olympus VR-320
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus TG-860 vs Olympus VR-330 Overview
Here is a in-depth assessment of the Olympus TG-860 and Olympus VR-330, former being a Waterproof while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom and they are both produced by Olympus. The image resolution of the TG-860 (16MP) and the VR-330 (14MP) is fairly similar and they feature the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
The TG-860 was manufactured 4 years later than the VR-330 and that is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus TG-860 being a Ultracompact camera and the Olympus VR-330 being a Compact camera.
Before diving straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a quick view of how the TG-860 scores versus the VR-330 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus TG-860 vs Olympus VR-330 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 & Olympus VR-330. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus TG-860 Gallery & Olympus VR-330 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-860 over the Olympus VR-330
TG-860 | VR-330 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2015 | ![]() | February 2011 | Fresher by 49 months |
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-330 over the Olympus TG-860
VR-330 | TG-860 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus TG-860 and Olympus VR-330
TG-860 | VR-330 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | No manual focusing | ||
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical display measurements |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 460k | Exact same display resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Neither contains Touch friendly display |
Olympus TG-860 vs Olympus VR-330 Physical Comparison
If you are planning to carry your camera often, you're going to have to factor in its weight and measurements. The Olympus TG-860 has got outside measurements of 110mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") with a weight of 224 grams (0.49 lbs) and the Olympus VR-330 has proportions of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).
Examine the Olympus TG-860 and Olympus VR-330 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are utilising at that time. Here is the front view sizing comparison of the TG-860 against the VR-330.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9d06d/9d06d15787463246035d569f494f2d2ab44801e4" alt="Olympus TG-860 vs Olympus VR-330 size comparison Olympus TG-860 vs Olympus VR-330 size comparison"
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the TG-860 and VR-330 is 91 and 94 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c409d/c409df677c091de9047032fd99466d4c97803d8b" alt="Olympus TG-860 vs Olympus VR-330 top view buttons comparison Olympus TG-860 vs Olympus VR-330 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus TG-860 vs Olympus VR-330 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be difficult to see the difference between sensor sizing purely by reading specs. The visual below will help provide you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the TG-860 and VR-330.
All in all, both of these cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but not the same megapixels. You can anticipate the Olympus TG-860 to offer greater detail due to its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also help you crop pics much more aggressively. The more recent TG-860 is going to have an edge when it comes to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3660c/3660cd785b5b2ce8f2b42a072b92c3b093196ca5" alt="Olympus TG-860 vs Olympus VR-330 sensor size comparison Olympus TG-860 vs Olympus VR-330 sensor size comparison"
Olympus TG-860 vs Olympus VR-330 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/41809/418092a7ff68e884378acd18258322aea0e19763" alt="Olympus TG-860 vs Olympus VR-330 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus TG-860 vs Olympus VR-330 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus TG-860 vs Olympus VR-330 Specifications
Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 | Olympus VR-330 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 | Olympus VR-330 |
Type | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2015-02-06 | 2011-02-08 |
Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic VII | TruePic III |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
Minimum native ISO | 125 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 21-105mm (5.0x) | 24-300mm (12.5x) |
Max aperture | f/3.5-5.7 | f/3.0-5.9 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 460k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Display technology | - | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter rate | 7.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.00 m (at ISO 1600) | 4.70 m |
Flash settings | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, off, LED illuminator | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (60p) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Yes | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 224 grams (0.49 lb) | 158 grams (0.35 lb) |
Dimensions | 110 x 64 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 pictures | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | Li-50B | LI-42B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD/SDHC |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at release | $279 | $220 |