Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung TL100
85 Imaging
34 Features
44 Overall
38


91 Imaging
34 Features
20 Overall
28
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung TL100 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-72mm (F2.5-4.4) lens
- 355g - 114 x 70 x 44mm
- Revealed March 2010
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F3.0-5.6) lens
- 219g - 105 x 61 x 37mm
- Released January 2009
- Alternative Name is ST50

Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung TL100 Overview
Let's examine more in depth at the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung TL100, former being a Advanced Mirrorless while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Ricoh and Samsung. The resolution of the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (10MP) and the TL100 (12MP) is pretty comparable but the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (1/1.7") and TL100 (1/2.3") use different sensor dimensions.

The GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC was announced 15 months later than the TL100 which makes the cameras a generation apart from each other. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung TL100 being a Compact camera.
Before getting in to a in depth comparison, below is a simple synopsis of how the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC scores vs the TL100 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung TL100 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC & Samsung TL100. The whole galleries are viewable at Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Gallery & Samsung TL100 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC over the Samsung TL100
GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | TL100 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | March 2010 | ![]() | January 2009 | Fresher by 15 months |
Manual focus | ![]() | More accurate focus | ||
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 920k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer screen (+690k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung TL100 over the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
TL100 | GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC |
---|
Common features in the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and Samsung TL100
GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | TL100 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Neither comes with Touch friendly screen |
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung TL100 Physical Comparison
When you are looking to carry your camera, you will need to consider its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC comes with outer dimensions of 114mm x 70mm x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") having a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs) while the Samsung TL100 has dimensions of 105mm x 61mm x 37mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") having a weight of 219 grams (0.48 lbs).
Compare the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung TL100 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you use during that time. The following is the front view over all size comparison of the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC versus the TL100.

Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and TL100 is 85 and 91 respectively.

Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung TL100 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, its difficult to imagine the contrast in sensor sizing merely by going through specs. The graphic underneath might give you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and TL100.
As you can plainly see, the 2 cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC having a bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF less difficult and the Samsung TL100 will show more detail with its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also help you crop pictures somewhat more aggressively. The fresher GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC should have an edge with regard to sensor technology.

Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung TL100 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung TL100 Specifications
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | Samsung TL100 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model | Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | Samsung TL100 |
Otherwise known as | - | ST50 |
Class | Advanced Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2010-03-18 | 2009-01-08 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | Smooth Imaging Engine IV | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 12MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Full resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4000 x 3000 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-72mm (3.0x) | 35-105mm (3.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/2.5-4.4 | f/3.0-5.6 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | 10cm |
Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
Screen resolution | 920 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 180 seconds | 1 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1500 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 2.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 4.50 m | - |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red eye fix |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 800 x 592 (20 fps) , 640 x 480 (30,15 fps) , 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 355 gr (0.78 pounds) | 219 gr (0.48 pounds) |
Dimensions | 114 x 70 x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") | 105 x 61 x 37mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 410 pictures | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/MMC/SDHC card |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch price | $349 | $22 |