Olympus TG-860 vs Panasonic FS42
91 Imaging
40 Features
42 Overall
40
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/042ab/042ab9bda5359b24c15525e105c8dbb85792e213" alt="Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 front Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f9979/f9979d6158b07faa33963a04f4938253f5f9ce99" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42 front"
95 Imaging
33 Features
10 Overall
23
Olympus TG-860 vs Panasonic FS42 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 224g - 110 x 64 x 28mm
- Introduced February 2015
- Replacement is Olympus TG-870
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1000 (Increase to 6400)
- 640 x 480 video
- 33-132mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 132g - 98 x 55 x 22mm
- Released April 2009
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus TG-860 vs Panasonic FS42 Overview
Here is a thorough overview of the Olympus TG-860 versus Panasonic FS42, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Ultracompact by companies Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a considerable gap among the resolutions of the TG-860 (16MP) and FS42 (10MP) and the TG-860 (1/2.3") and FS42 (1/2.5") come with totally different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
The TG-860 was released 5 years later than the FS42 and that is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras offer the identical body type (Ultracompact).
Before delving straight into a complete comparison, below is a quick view of how the TG-860 matches up against the FS42 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus TG-860 vs Panasonic FS42 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42. The complete galleries are available at Olympus TG-860 Gallery & Panasonic FS42 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-860 over the Panasonic FS42
TG-860 | FS42 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2015 | ![]() | April 2009 | Fresher by 71 months |
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FS42 over the Olympus TG-860
FS42 | TG-860 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus TG-860 and Panasonic FS42
TG-860 | FS42 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | No manual focusing | ||
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Neither offers Touch friendly screen |
Olympus TG-860 vs Panasonic FS42 Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to carry your camera often, you will need to take into account its weight and size. The Olympus TG-860 offers exterior measurements of 110mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") with a weight of 224 grams (0.49 lbs) whilst the Panasonic FS42 has specifications of 98mm x 55mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") and a weight of 132 grams (0.29 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus TG-860 versus Panasonic FS42 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are utilising during that time. Following is the front view measurements comparison of the TG-860 compared to the FS42.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/049fb/049fb37e7d6177ab617bb419f13e30816b0eed31" alt="Olympus TG-860 vs Panasonic FS42 size comparison Olympus TG-860 vs Panasonic FS42 size comparison"
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the TG-860 and FS42 is 91 and 95 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f1acd/f1acd78c017f489db517de9e03e614b133fc2c0c" alt="Olympus TG-860 vs Panasonic FS42 top view buttons comparison Olympus TG-860 vs Panasonic FS42 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus TG-860 vs Panasonic FS42 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, its tough to see the gap in sensor sizing merely by checking out specs. The photograph underneath might provide you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the TG-860 and FS42.
As you can plainly see, each of the cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The TG-860 because of its bigger sensor will make getting shallower DOF less difficult and the Olympus TG-860 will produce greater detail as a result of its extra 6MP. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop photographs far more aggressively. The younger TG-860 is going to have an advantage in sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9a96a/9a96ace84a35f282150cb584582490ebaeef3deb" alt="Olympus TG-860 vs Panasonic FS42 sensor size comparison Olympus TG-860 vs Panasonic FS42 sensor size comparison"
Olympus TG-860 vs Panasonic FS42 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/91188/91188c9f9fc256681b5b7fb39b18676f5a44665b" alt="Olympus TG-860 vs Panasonic FS42 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus TG-860 vs Panasonic FS42 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus TG-860 vs Panasonic FS42 Specifications
Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42 |
Class | Waterproof | Ultracompact |
Introduced | 2015-02-06 | 2009-04-17 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic VII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.5" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 5.744 x 4.308mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 24.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 10MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 1000 |
Max boosted ISO | - | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 125 | 80 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 21-105mm (5.0x) | 33-132mm (4.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.7 | f/2.8-5.9 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 5cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 6.3 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3" | 2.5" |
Screen resolution | 460 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 60 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 7.0 frames per sec | 2.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.00 m (at ISO 1600) | 6.30 m |
Flash options | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, off, LED illuminator | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (60p) | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video data format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Yes | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 224 grams (0.49 lb) | 132 grams (0.29 lb) |
Dimensions | 110 x 64 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") | 98 x 55 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 images | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | Li-50B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Pricing at launch | $279 | $580 |