Olympus TG-860 vs Panasonic FZ1000
91 Imaging
40 Features
42 Overall
40


55 Imaging
51 Features
80 Overall
62
Olympus TG-860 vs Panasonic FZ1000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 224g - 110 x 64 x 28mm
- Released February 2015
- New Model is Olympus TG-870
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Raise to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-400mm (F2.8-4.0) lens
- 831g - 137 x 99 x 131mm
- Launched June 2014
- Later Model is Panasonic FZ2500

Olympus TG-860 vs Panasonic FZ1000 Overview
Lets look a little more closely at the Olympus TG-860 versus Panasonic FZ1000, former is a Waterproof while the other is a Large Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Olympus and Panasonic. The sensor resolution of the TG-860 (16MP) and the FZ1000 (20MP) is fairly well matched but the TG-860 (1/2.3") and FZ1000 (1") use totally different sensor sizes.

The TG-860 was released 8 months after the FZ1000 so they are of a similar age. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus TG-860 being a Ultracompact camera and the Panasonic FZ1000 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before delving through a step-by-step comparison, below is a quick summary of how the TG-860 grades against the FZ1000 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Olympus TG-860 vs Panasonic FZ1000 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ1000. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus TG-860 Gallery & Panasonic FZ1000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-860 over the Panasonic FZ1000
TG-860 | FZ1000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2015 | ![]() | June 2014 | Newer by 8 months |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ1000 over the Olympus TG-860
FZ1000 | TG-860 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Very exact focusing | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Tilting | Fully Articulating display |
Display resolution | 921k | ![]() | 460k | Clearer display (+461k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies |
Common features in the Olympus TG-860 and Panasonic FZ1000
TG-860 | FZ1000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent display dimensions |
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Lacking Touch friendly display |
Olympus TG-860 vs Panasonic FZ1000 Physical Comparison
If you're going to travel with your camera frequently, you are going to need to think about its weight and proportions. The Olympus TG-860 features external measurements of 110mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 224 grams (0.49 lbs) and the Panasonic FZ1000 has measurements of 137mm x 99mm x 131mm (5.4" x 3.9" x 5.2") accompanied by a weight of 831 grams (1.83 lbs).
See the Olympus TG-860 versus Panasonic FZ1000 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are utilizing at the time. The following is the front view overall size comparison of the TG-860 versus the FZ1000.

Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the TG-860 and FZ1000 is 91 and 55 respectively.

Olympus TG-860 vs Panasonic FZ1000 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it can be difficult to see the difference between sensor dimensions merely by checking a spec sheet. The pic underneath should offer you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the TG-860 and FZ1000.
Clearly, both of those cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The TG-860 because of its tinier sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field trickier and the Panasonic FZ1000 will give more detail as a result of its extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop photos a little more aggressively. The fresher TG-860 will have a benefit in sensor technology.

Olympus TG-860 vs Panasonic FZ1000 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus TG-860 vs Panasonic FZ1000 Specifications
Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ1000 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ1000 |
Category | Waterproof | Large Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2015-02-06 | 2014-06-12 |
Physical type | Ultracompact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic VII | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 20MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5472 x 3648 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 12800 |
Maximum boosted ISO | - | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 125 | 125 |
RAW pictures | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | - | 80 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Total focus points | - | 49 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 21-105mm (5.0x) | 25-400mm (16.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.5-5.7 | f/2.8-4.0 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | 3cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Tilting | Fully Articulated |
Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 460 thousand dots | 921 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,359 thousand dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.7x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 60s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 7.0fps | 12.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.00 m (at ISO 1600) | 13.50 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash options | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, off, LED illuminator | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync, Slow Sync/Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (60p) | 3840x2160 (30p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 30p, 24p) 1280x720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
Video format | H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Yes | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 224g (0.49 pounds) | 831g (1.83 pounds) |
Dimensions | 110 x 64 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") | 137 x 99 x 131mm (5.4" x 3.9" x 5.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 64 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.1 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 11.7 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 517 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 shots | 360 shots |
Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | Li-50B | DMW-BLC12PP |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) | Yes |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | - |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Cost at launch | $279 | $800 |