Olympus TG-860 vs Panasonic FZ200
91 Imaging
40 Features
42 Overall
40


65 Imaging
36 Features
64 Overall
47
Olympus TG-860 vs Panasonic FZ200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 224g - 110 x 64 x 28mm
- Launched February 2015
- New Model is Olympus TG-870
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Boost to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-600mm (F2.8) lens
- 588g - 125 x 87 x 110mm
- Launched July 2012
- Older Model is Panasonic FZ100
- Replacement is Panasonic FZ300

Olympus TG-860 vs Panasonic FZ200 Overview
Its time to look more closely at the Olympus TG-860 versus Panasonic FZ200, former being a Waterproof while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a large gap between the resolutions of the TG-860 (16MP) and FZ200 (12MP) but they enjoy the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").

The TG-860 was manufactured 2 years later than the FZ200 and that is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras come with different body type with the Olympus TG-860 being a Ultracompact camera and the Panasonic FZ200 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before delving in to a comprehensive comparison, below is a quick introduction of how the TG-860 grades vs the FZ200 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Olympus TG-860 vs Panasonic FZ200 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200. The entire galleries are available at Olympus TG-860 Gallery & Panasonic FZ200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-860 over the Panasonic FZ200
TG-860 | FZ200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2015 | ![]() | July 2012 | Fresher by 32 months |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ200 over the Olympus TG-860
FZ200 | TG-860 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial exact focusing | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Tilting | Fully Articulating display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies |
Common features in the Olympus TG-860 and Panasonic FZ200
TG-860 | FZ200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical display dimensions |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 460k | Exact same display resolution |
Touch display | ![]() | Absent Touch display |
Olympus TG-860 vs Panasonic FZ200 Physical Comparison
When you are looking to carry your camera, you'll have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus TG-860 has outside measurements of 110mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") along with a weight of 224 grams (0.49 lbs) while the Panasonic FZ200 has dimensions of 125mm x 87mm x 110mm (4.9" x 3.4" x 4.3") having a weight of 588 grams (1.30 lbs).
Check the Olympus TG-860 versus Panasonic FZ200 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have at the time. Underneath is the front view physical size comparison of the TG-860 versus the FZ200.

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the TG-860 and FZ200 is 91 and 65 respectively.

Olympus TG-860 vs Panasonic FZ200 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is hard to envision the difference between sensor sizing purely by reading through technical specs. The photograph underneath might provide you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the TG-860 and FZ200.
As you have seen, both cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but not the same megapixels. You can anticipate the Olympus TG-860 to resolve more detail due to its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop images somewhat more aggressively. The more modern TG-860 is going to have a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.

Olympus TG-860 vs Panasonic FZ200 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus TG-860 vs Panasonic FZ200 Specifications
Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200 |
Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2015-02-06 | 2012-07-18 |
Physical type | Ultracompact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic VII | Venus Engine VII FHD |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Max enhanced ISO | - | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 125 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 23 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 21-105mm (5.0x) | 25-600mm (24.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.7 | f/2.8 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Fully Articulated |
Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 460k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen tech | - | Free-Angle TFT Screen LCD Display |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 1,312k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 60 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 7.0 frames per second | 12.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 4.00 m (at ISO 1600) | 13.50 m |
Flash modes | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, off, LED illuminator | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | - | 1/4000 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (60p) | 1920 x 1080 (60, 50, 30, 25 fps), 1280 x 720p (60, 50, 30, 25 fps), 640 x 480 (240, 120, 30, 25 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Yes | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 224 gr (0.49 lb) | 588 gr (1.30 lb) |
Dimensions | 110 x 64 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") | 125 x 87 x 110mm (4.9" x 3.4" x 4.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 37 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 19.1 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 10.8 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 114 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 images | 540 images |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | Li-50B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at release | $279 | $499 |