Olympus TG-860 vs Panasonic G95
91 Imaging
41 Features
42 Overall
41
67 Imaging
62 Features
88 Overall
72
Olympus TG-860 vs Panasonic G95 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 224g - 110 x 64 x 28mm
- Revealed February 2015
- Successor is Olympus TG-870
(Full Review)
- 20.3MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 536g - 130 x 94 x 77mm
- Introduced April 2019
- Additionally referred to as Lumix DMC-G90
- Old Model is Panasonic G85
Olympus TG-860 vs Panasonic G95 Overview
Following is a in-depth assessment of the Olympus TG-860 vs Panasonic G95, one is a Waterproof and the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by rivals Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a crucial gap among the sensor resolutions of the TG-860 (16MP) and G95 (20.3MP) and the TG-860 (1/2.3") and G95 (Four Thirds) possess totally different sensor measurements.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe TG-860 was revealed 5 years before the G95 which is a fairly serious gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus TG-860 being a Ultracompact camera and the Panasonic G95 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before diving in to a thorough comparison, below is a concise synopsis of how the TG-860 grades versus the G95 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus TG-860 vs Panasonic G95 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-G95. The full galleries are available at Olympus TG-860 Gallery and Panasonic G95 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-860 over the Panasonic G95
TG-860 | G95 |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic G95 over the Olympus TG-860
G95 | TG-860 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | April 2019 | February 2015 | More modern by 50 months | |
Manual focus | More accurate focus | |||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Tilting | Fully Articulating screen | |
Screen resolution | 1240k | 460k | Sharper screen (+780k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies | |||
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus TG-860 and Panasonic G95
TG-860 | G95 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical screen measurements |
Olympus TG-860 vs Panasonic G95 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to carry around your camera frequently, you need to factor its weight and proportions. The Olympus TG-860 provides exterior measurements of 110mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 224 grams (0.49 lbs) and the Panasonic G95 has measurements of 130mm x 94mm x 77mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 3.0") along with a weight of 536 grams (1.18 lbs).
See the Olympus TG-860 vs Panasonic G95 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Here is the front view overall size comparison of the TG-860 vs the G95.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the TG-860 and G95 is 91 and 67 respectively.
Olympus TG-860 vs Panasonic G95 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is hard to visualise the difference in sensor sizes simply by looking through specifications. The image here may offer you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the TG-860 and G95.
To sum up, each of these cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The TG-860 with its smaller sensor will make shooting shallower DOF more difficult and the Panasonic G95 will render greater detail because of its extra 4.3 Megapixels. Higher resolution will enable you to crop pictures somewhat more aggressively. The more aged TG-860 will be behind with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus TG-860 vs Panasonic G95 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus TG-860 vs Panasonic G95 Specifications
Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-G95 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-G95 |
Otherwise known as | - | Lumix DMC-G90 |
Category | Waterproof | Advanced Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2015-02-06 | 2019-04-05 |
Physical type | Ultracompact | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic VII | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Four Thirds |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 20.3 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5184 x 3888 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 125 | 200 |
RAW data | ||
Minimum enhanced ISO | - | 100 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | - | 49 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | Micro Four Thirds |
Lens focal range | 21-105mm (5.0x) | - |
Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.7 | - |
Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
Available lenses | - | 107 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Tilting | Fully Articulated |
Display sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 460k dots | 1,240k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.74x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4s | 60s |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Max quiet shutter speed | - | 1/16000s |
Continuous shutter rate | 7.0 frames/s | 9.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 4.00 m (at ISO 1600) | 6.40 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash settings | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, off, LED illuminator | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync., Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (60p) | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 100 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
Video format | H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Yes | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 224 gr (0.49 lbs) | 536 gr (1.18 lbs) |
Dimensions | 110 x 64 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") | 130 x 94 x 77mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 3.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 photographs | 290 photographs |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | Li-50B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, 10 secs x 3 shots) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-II supported) |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail price | $279 | $998 |