Olympus TG-860 vs Pentax RZ10
91 Imaging
40 Features
42 Overall
40
92 Imaging
37 Features
31 Overall
34
Olympus TG-860 vs Pentax RZ10 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 224g - 110 x 64 x 28mm
- Introduced February 2015
- Renewed by Olympus TG-870
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-280mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 178g - 97 x 61 x 33mm
- Released July 2011
Olympus TG-860 vs Pentax RZ10 Overview
Its time to look more closely at the Olympus TG-860 versus Pentax RZ10, one is a Waterproof and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Olympus and Pentax. The resolution of the TG-860 (16MP) and the RZ10 (14MP) is relatively well matched and both cameras provide the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe TG-860 was manufactured 3 years after the RZ10 which is quite a sizable gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus TG-860 being a Ultracompact camera and the Pentax RZ10 being a Compact camera.
Before going right into a in depth comparison, here is a brief summary of how the TG-860 grades vs the RZ10 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus TG-860 vs Pentax RZ10 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 and Pentax Optio RZ10. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus TG-860 Gallery and Pentax RZ10 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-860 over the Pentax RZ10
TG-860 | RZ10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2015 | July 2011 | Newer by 44 months | |
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Pentax RZ10 over the Olympus TG-860
RZ10 | TG-860 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Very precise focusing |
Common features in the Olympus TG-860 and Pentax RZ10
TG-860 | RZ10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Missing Touch screen |
Olympus TG-860 vs Pentax RZ10 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to travel with your camera regularly, you will want to factor its weight and size. The Olympus TG-860 offers physical measurements of 110mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") along with a weight of 224 grams (0.49 lbs) and the Pentax RZ10 has specifications of 97mm x 61mm x 33mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.3") with a weight of 178 grams (0.39 lbs).
See the Olympus TG-860 versus Pentax RZ10 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are using at that time. Below is a front view sizing comparison of the TG-860 versus the RZ10.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the TG-860 and RZ10 is 91 and 92 respectively.
Olympus TG-860 vs Pentax RZ10 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be tough to visualize the difference between sensor dimensions purely by looking at specifications. The picture here will help provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the TG-860 and RZ10.
Plainly, both of these cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit different megapixels. You should count on the Olympus TG-860 to give you more detail due to its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop pictures more aggressively. The more recent TG-860 should have a benefit with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus TG-860 vs Pentax RZ10 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus TG-860 vs Pentax RZ10 Specifications
Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 | Pentax Optio RZ10 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Pentax |
Model | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 | Pentax Optio RZ10 |
Category | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2015-02-06 | 2011-07-19 |
Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic VII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 125 | 80 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 21-105mm (5.0x) | 28-280mm (10.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.7 | f/3.2-5.9 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
Screen resolution | 460 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT color LCD with Anti-reflective coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 7.0 frames per second | 1.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 4.00 m (at ISO 1600) | 2.80 m |
Flash modes | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, off, LED illuminator | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (60p) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Yes | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 224 gr (0.49 lb) | 178 gr (0.39 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 110 x 64 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") | 97 x 61 x 33mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 images | 178 images |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | Li-50B | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Price at launch | $279 | $200 |