Olympus TG-860 vs Pentax WG-3
91 Imaging
41 Features
42 Overall
41
![Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 front Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Olympus-Stylus-Tough-TG-860/Olympus-TG-860-front.jpg)
![Pentax WG-3 front Pentax WG-3 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Pentax-WG-3/Pentax-WG-3-front.jpg)
90 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
Olympus TG-860 vs Pentax WG-3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 224g - 110 x 64 x 28mm
- Released February 2015
- Successor is Olympus TG-870
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Introduced July 2013
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Olympus TG-860 vs Pentax WG-3 Overview
Lets examine more in depth at the Olympus TG-860 vs Pentax WG-3, both Waterproof cameras by competitors Olympus and Pentax. The sensor resolution of the TG-860 (16MP) and the WG-3 (16MP) is very close and they possess the same exact sensor size (1/2.3").
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
The TG-860 was manufactured 19 months after the WG-3 making the cameras a generation away from one another. The two cameras offer different body type with the Olympus TG-860 being a Ultracompact camera and the Pentax WG-3 being a Compact camera.
Before going straight into a thorough comparison, below is a simple summation of how the TG-860 matches up vs the WG-3 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Olympus TG-860 vs Pentax WG-3 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 & Pentax WG-3. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus TG-860 Gallery & Pentax WG-3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-860 over the Pentax WG-3
TG-860 | WG-3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | February 2015 | ![]() | July 2013 | More modern by 19 months |
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-3 over the Olympus TG-860
WG-3 | TG-860 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Very accurate focusing |
Common features in the Olympus TG-860 and Pentax WG-3
TG-860 | WG-3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent display size |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 460k | The same display resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lack of selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Lack of Touch display |
Olympus TG-860 vs Pentax WG-3 Physical Comparison
For those who are going to carry around your camera frequently, you will have to factor its weight and proportions. The Olympus TG-860 features outer dimensions of 110mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 224 grams (0.49 lbs) while the Pentax WG-3 has measurements of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
Examine the Olympus TG-860 vs Pentax WG-3 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you select during that time. Here is the front view size comparison of the TG-860 against the WG-3.
![Olympus TG-860 vs Pentax WG-3 size comparison Olympus TG-860 vs Pentax WG-3 size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Olympus-Stylus-Tough-TG-860-vs-Pentax-WG-3-size-comparison.jpg)
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the TG-860 and WG-3 is 91 and 90 respectively.
![Olympus TG-860 vs Pentax WG-3 top view buttons comparison Olympus TG-860 vs Pentax WG-3 top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Olympus-Stylus-Tough-TG-860-vs-Pentax-WG-3-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Olympus TG-860 vs Pentax WG-3 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is very difficult to imagine the gap in sensor sizes only by looking through technical specs. The pic here might give you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the TG-860 and WG-3.
As you have seen, both cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing and the identical MP so you can expect comparable quality of pictures however you will need to factor the age of the cameras into account. The more recent TG-860 should have an edge with regard to sensor innovation.
![Olympus TG-860 vs Pentax WG-3 sensor size comparison Olympus TG-860 vs Pentax WG-3 sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Olympus-Stylus-Tough-TG-860-vs-Pentax-WG-3-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Olympus TG-860 vs Pentax WG-3 Screen and ViewFinder
![Olympus TG-860 vs Pentax WG-3 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus TG-860 vs Pentax WG-3 Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Olympus-Stylus-Tough-TG-860-vs-Pentax-WG-3-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Olympus TG-860 vs Pentax WG-3 Specifications
Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 | Pentax WG-3 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Pentax |
Model | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 | Pentax WG-3 |
Category | Waterproof | Waterproof |
Released | 2015-02-06 | 2013-07-19 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic VII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 125 | 125 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 21-105mm (5.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.7 | f/2.0-4.9 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 460 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen tech | - | Widescreen TFT color LCD with anti-reflective coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 7.0fps | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 4.00 m (at ISO 1600) | 3.40 m |
Flash settings | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, off, LED illuminator | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (60p) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Yes | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 224 grams (0.49 pounds) | 230 grams (0.51 pounds) |
Dimensions | 110 x 64 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 pictures | 240 pictures |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | Li-50B | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Pricing at release | $279 | $300 |