Olympus TG-860 vs Ricoh CX2
91 Imaging
40 Features
42 Overall
40
93 Imaging
32 Features
35 Overall
33
Olympus TG-860 vs Ricoh CX2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 224g - 110 x 64 x 28mm
- Revealed February 2015
- Renewed by Olympus TG-870
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 185g - 102 x 58 x 29mm
- Launched August 2009
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus TG-860 vs Ricoh CX2 Overview
The following is a extensive review of the Olympus TG-860 vs Ricoh CX2, former is a Waterproof while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Olympus and Ricoh. There exists a large gap among the sensor resolutions of the TG-860 (16MP) and CX2 (9MP) but both cameras posses the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe TG-860 was announced 5 years after the CX2 which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Olympus TG-860 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh CX2 being a Compact camera.
Before delving straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a concise overview of how the TG-860 matches up against the CX2 for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus TG-860 vs Ricoh CX2 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 & Ricoh CX2. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus TG-860 Gallery & Ricoh CX2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-860 over the Ricoh CX2
| TG-860 | CX2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | February 2015 |  | August 2009 | Newer by 67 months |
| Display type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting display |
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX2 over the Olympus TG-860
| CX2 | TG-860 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Very exact focus | ||
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 460k | Clearer display (+460k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus TG-860 and Ricoh CX2
| TG-860 | CX2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal display measurements |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither provides Touch friendly display |
Olympus TG-860 vs Ricoh CX2 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to travel with your camera often, you will have to consider its weight and volume. The Olympus TG-860 provides outer dimensions of 110mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") and a weight of 224 grams (0.49 lbs) while the Ricoh CX2 has sizing of 102mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 185 grams (0.41 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus TG-860 vs Ricoh CX2 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Following is a front view measurement comparison of the TG-860 compared to the CX2.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the TG-860 and CX2 is 91 and 93 respectively.
Olympus TG-860 vs Ricoh CX2 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be tough to picture the difference in sensor dimensions simply by looking through specs. The image below will help offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the TG-860 and CX2.
All in all, both cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but different resolution. You can anticipate the Olympus TG-860 to render extra detail with its extra 7MP. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop photos more aggressively. The more modern TG-860 should have an edge in sensor technology.
Olympus TG-860 vs Ricoh CX2 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Olympus TG-860 vs Ricoh CX2 Specifications
| Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 | Ricoh CX2 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model type | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 | Ricoh CX2 |
| Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2015-02-06 | 2009-08-20 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic VII | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 9 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3456 x 2592 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 125 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 21-105mm (5.0x) | 28-300mm (10.7x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.5-5.7 | f/3.5-5.6 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 460 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 8s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 7.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.00 m (at ISO 1600) | 3.00 m (ISO 400) |
| Flash settings | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, off, LED illuminator | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (60p) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | Yes | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 224g (0.49 lb) | 185g (0.41 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 110 x 64 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") | 102 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 pictures | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | Li-50B | DB-70 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch cost | $279 | $341 |