Olympus TG-860 vs Ricoh CX2
91 Imaging
40 Features
42 Overall
40
93 Imaging
32 Features
35 Overall
33
Olympus TG-860 vs Ricoh CX2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 224g - 110 x 64 x 28mm
- Revealed February 2015
- Renewed by Olympus TG-870
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 185g - 102 x 58 x 29mm
- Launched August 2009
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus TG-860 vs Ricoh CX2 Overview
The following is a extensive review of the Olympus TG-860 vs Ricoh CX2, former is a Waterproof while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Olympus and Ricoh. There exists a large gap among the sensor resolutions of the TG-860 (16MP) and CX2 (9MP) but both cameras posses the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe TG-860 was announced 5 years after the CX2 which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Olympus TG-860 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh CX2 being a Compact camera.
Before delving straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a concise overview of how the TG-860 matches up against the CX2 for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus TG-860 vs Ricoh CX2 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 & Ricoh CX2. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus TG-860 Gallery & Ricoh CX2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-860 over the Ricoh CX2
| TG-860 | CX2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | February 2015 |  | August 2009 | Newer by 67 months |
| Display type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting display |
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX2 over the Olympus TG-860
| CX2 | TG-860 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Very exact focus | ||
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 460k | Clearer display (+460k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus TG-860 and Ricoh CX2
| TG-860 | CX2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal display measurements |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither provides Touch friendly display |
Olympus TG-860 vs Ricoh CX2 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to travel with your camera often, you will have to consider its weight and volume. The Olympus TG-860 provides outer dimensions of 110mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") and a weight of 224 grams (0.49 lbs) while the Ricoh CX2 has sizing of 102mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 185 grams (0.41 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus TG-860 vs Ricoh CX2 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Following is a front view measurement comparison of the TG-860 compared to the CX2.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the TG-860 and CX2 is 91 and 93 respectively.
Olympus TG-860 vs Ricoh CX2 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be tough to picture the difference in sensor dimensions simply by looking through specs. The image below will help offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the TG-860 and CX2.
All in all, both cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but different resolution. You can anticipate the Olympus TG-860 to render extra detail with its extra 7MP. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop photos more aggressively. The more modern TG-860 should have an edge in sensor technology.
Olympus TG-860 vs Ricoh CX2 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Olympus TG-860 vs Ricoh CX2 Specifications
| Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 | Ricoh CX2 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model type | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 | Ricoh CX2 |
| Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2015-02-06 | 2009-08-20 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic VII | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 9 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3456 x 2592 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 125 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 21-105mm (5.0x) | 28-300mm (10.7x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.5-5.7 | f/3.5-5.6 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 460 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 8s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 7.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.00 m (at ISO 1600) | 3.00 m (ISO 400) |
| Flash settings | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, off, LED illuminator | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (60p) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | Yes | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 224g (0.49 lb) | 185g (0.41 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 110 x 64 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") | 102 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 pictures | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | Li-50B | DB-70 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch cost | $279 | $341 |