Olympus TG-860 vs Ricoh CX2
91 Imaging
40 Features
42 Overall
40
93 Imaging
32 Features
35 Overall
33
Olympus TG-860 vs Ricoh CX2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 224g - 110 x 64 x 28mm
- Revealed February 2015
- Renewed by Olympus TG-870
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 185g - 102 x 58 x 29mm
- Launched August 2009
Olympus TG-860 vs Ricoh CX2 Overview
The following is a extensive review of the Olympus TG-860 vs Ricoh CX2, former is a Waterproof while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Olympus and Ricoh. There exists a large gap among the sensor resolutions of the TG-860 (16MP) and CX2 (9MP) but both cameras posses the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe TG-860 was announced 5 years after the CX2 which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Olympus TG-860 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh CX2 being a Compact camera.
Before delving straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a concise overview of how the TG-860 matches up against the CX2 for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus TG-860 vs Ricoh CX2 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 & Ricoh CX2. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus TG-860 Gallery & Ricoh CX2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-860 over the Ricoh CX2
TG-860 | CX2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2015 | August 2009 | Newer by 67 months | |
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display |
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX2 over the Olympus TG-860
CX2 | TG-860 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Very exact focus | |||
Display resolution | 920k | 460k | Clearer display (+460k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus TG-860 and Ricoh CX2
TG-860 | CX2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal display measurements | |
Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Neither provides Touch friendly display |
Olympus TG-860 vs Ricoh CX2 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to travel with your camera often, you will have to consider its weight and volume. The Olympus TG-860 provides outer dimensions of 110mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") and a weight of 224 grams (0.49 lbs) while the Ricoh CX2 has sizing of 102mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 185 grams (0.41 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus TG-860 vs Ricoh CX2 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Following is a front view measurement comparison of the TG-860 compared to the CX2.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the TG-860 and CX2 is 91 and 93 respectively.
Olympus TG-860 vs Ricoh CX2 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be tough to picture the difference in sensor dimensions simply by looking through specs. The image below will help offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the TG-860 and CX2.
All in all, both cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but different resolution. You can anticipate the Olympus TG-860 to render extra detail with its extra 7MP. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop photos more aggressively. The more modern TG-860 should have an edge in sensor technology.
Olympus TG-860 vs Ricoh CX2 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus TG-860 vs Ricoh CX2 Specifications
Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 | Ricoh CX2 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model type | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 | Ricoh CX2 |
Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2015-02-06 | 2009-08-20 |
Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic VII | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 9 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3456 x 2592 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
Min native ISO | 125 | 80 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 21-105mm (5.0x) | 28-300mm (10.7x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.5-5.7 | f/3.5-5.6 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 460 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 8s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 7.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.00 m (at ISO 1600) | 3.00 m (ISO 400) |
Flash settings | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, off, LED illuminator | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (60p) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Yes | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 224g (0.49 lb) | 185g (0.41 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 110 x 64 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") | 102 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 pictures | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | Li-50B | DB-70 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch cost | $279 | $341 |