Olympus TG-860 vs Ricoh CX4
91 Imaging
41 Features
42 Overall
41
92 Imaging
33 Features
34 Overall
33
Olympus TG-860 vs Ricoh CX4 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 224g - 110 x 64 x 28mm
- Revealed February 2015
- Refreshed by Olympus TG-870
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 205g - 102 x 59 x 29mm
- Released August 2010
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus TG-860 vs Ricoh CX4 Overview
In this article, we will be contrasting the Olympus TG-860 vs Ricoh CX4, one is a Waterproof and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Olympus and Ricoh. There exists a crucial gap among the sensor resolutions of the TG-860 (16MP) and CX4 (10MP) but they feature the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe TG-860 was revealed 4 years after the CX4 which is a fairly serious gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras offer different body type with the Olympus TG-860 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh CX4 being a Compact camera.
Before getting through a in-depth comparison, below is a concise synopsis of how the TG-860 matches up versus the CX4 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus TG-860 vs Ricoh CX4 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 and Ricoh CX4. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus TG-860 Gallery and Ricoh CX4 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-860 over the Ricoh CX4
| TG-860 | CX4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | February 2015 |  | August 2010 | More modern by 55 months |
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX4 over the Olympus TG-860
| CX4 | TG-860 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Dial accurate focus | ||
| Screen resolution | 920k |  | 460k | Clearer screen (+460k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus TG-860 and Ricoh CX4
| TG-860 | CX4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent screen dimensions |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither provides Touch friendly screen |
Olympus TG-860 vs Ricoh CX4 Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to carry around your camera, you'll have to consider its weight and dimensions. The Olympus TG-860 provides outside measurements of 110mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 224 grams (0.49 lbs) while the Ricoh CX4 has dimensions of 102mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs).
See the Olympus TG-860 vs Ricoh CX4 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you have attached at that moment. Following is the front view measurements comparison of the TG-860 vs the CX4.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the TG-860 and CX4 is 91 and 92 respectively.
Olympus TG-860 vs Ricoh CX4 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, its hard to see the gap in sensor sizes purely by researching specs. The picture underneath might provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the TG-860 and CX4.
All in all, both the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same MP. You should expect the Olympus TG-860 to render extra detail because of its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will help you crop shots far more aggressively. The more recent TG-860 is going to have an advantage in sensor innovation.
Olympus TG-860 vs Ricoh CX4 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Olympus TG-860 vs Ricoh CX4 Specifications
| Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 | Ricoh CX4 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 | Ricoh CX4 |
| Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2015-02-06 | 2010-08-19 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic VII | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 125 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 21-105mm (5.0x) | 28-300mm (10.7x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.5-5.7 | f/3.5-5.6 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 460 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 8s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 7.0fps | 5.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.00 m (at ISO 1600) | 4.00 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, off, LED illuminator | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (60p) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | Yes | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 224 grams (0.49 lbs) | 205 grams (0.45 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 110 x 64 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") | 102 x 59 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 photographs | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | Li-50B | DB-100 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch pricing | $279 | $211 |