Olympus TG-860 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV
91 Imaging
40 Features
42 Overall
40
92 Imaging
35 Features
47 Overall
39
Olympus TG-860 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 224g - 110 x 64 x 28mm
- Announced February 2015
- Later Model is Olympus TG-870
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28mm (F1.9) lens
- 190g - 109 x 59 x 33mm
- Released September 2011
- Earlier Model is Ricoh GR Digital III
Olympus TG-860 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Overview
Below is a in depth analysis of the Olympus TG-860 versus Ricoh GR Digital IV, one being a Waterproof and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Olympus and Ricoh. There is a sizeable difference among the resolutions of the TG-860 (16MP) and GR Digital IV (10MP) and the TG-860 (1/2.3") and GR Digital IV (1/1.7") possess totally different sensor measurements.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe TG-860 was manufactured 3 years later than the GR Digital IV and that is a fairly large gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus TG-860 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh GR Digital IV being a Compact camera.
Before we go through a in depth comparison, below is a brief view of how the TG-860 scores versus the GR Digital IV with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus TG-860 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 and Ricoh GR Digital IV. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus TG-860 Gallery and Ricoh GR Digital IV Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-860 over the Ricoh GR Digital IV
TG-860 | GR Digital IV | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2015 | September 2011 | More recent by 42 months | |
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital IV over the Olympus TG-860
GR Digital IV | TG-860 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Very accurate focusing | |||
Screen resolution | 1230k | 460k | Clearer screen (+770k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus TG-860 and Ricoh GR Digital IV
TG-860 | GR Digital IV | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent screen measurements | |
Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Neither has Touch friendly screen |
Olympus TG-860 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Physical Comparison
If you are intending to lug around your camera frequently, you'll have to factor in its weight and volume. The Olympus TG-860 has outside measurements of 110mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") along with a weight of 224 grams (0.49 lbs) and the Ricoh GR Digital IV has sizing of 109mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus TG-860 versus Ricoh GR Digital IV in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are employing at that moment. Following is the front view measurements comparison of the TG-860 vs the GR Digital IV.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the TG-860 and GR Digital IV is 91 and 92 respectively.
Olympus TG-860 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Sensor Comparison
Often, its hard to envision the difference in sensor measurements only by researching a spec sheet. The graphic here may provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the TG-860 and GR Digital IV.
As you can see, both the cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The TG-860 due to its smaller sensor will make getting shallow depth of field trickier and the Olympus TG-860 will result in greater detail due to its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also help you crop shots a little more aggressively. The fresher TG-860 will have an edge when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus TG-860 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus TG-860 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Specifications
Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 | Ricoh GR Digital IV | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 | Ricoh GR Digital IV |
Type | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2015-02-06 | 2011-09-15 |
Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic VII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 10MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 125 | 80 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 21-105mm (5.0x) | 28mm (1x) |
Max aperture | f/3.5-5.7 | f/1.9 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 460k dots | 1,230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Optical (optional) |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 1 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 7.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 4.00 m (at ISO 1600) | 3.00 m |
Flash options | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, off, LED illuminator | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (60p) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Yes | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 224g (0.49 lbs) | 190g (0.42 lbs) |
Dimensions | 110 x 64 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") | 109 x 59 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 pictures | 390 pictures |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | Li-50B | DB65 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Retail price | $279 | $599 |