Olympus TG-860 vs Samsung SL202
91 Imaging
40 Features
42 Overall
40
94 Imaging
32 Features
17 Overall
26
Olympus TG-860 vs Samsung SL202 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 224g - 110 x 64 x 28mm
- Released February 2015
- Updated by Olympus TG-870
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
- 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
- Introduced February 2009
- Other Name is PL50
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus TG-860 vs Samsung SL202 Overview
Here is a extensive review of the Olympus TG-860 versus Samsung SL202, one being a Waterproof and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Olympus and Samsung. There is a significant difference between the image resolutions of the TG-860 (16MP) and SL202 (10MP) but both cameras posses the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe TG-860 was manufactured 6 years later than the SL202 and that is quite a sizable gap as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus TG-860 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung SL202 being a Compact camera.
Before we go into a detailed comparison, here is a concise synopsis of how the TG-860 matches up against the SL202 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus TG-860 vs Samsung SL202 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 and Samsung SL202. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus TG-860 Gallery and Samsung SL202 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-860 over the Samsung SL202
| TG-860 | SL202 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2015 | February 2009 | Fresher by 73 months | |
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
| Display size | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
| Display resolution | 460k | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL202 over the Olympus TG-860
| SL202 | TG-860 |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus TG-860 and Samsung SL202
| TG-860 | SL202 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | No manual focusing | |||
| Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly display | Neither has Touch friendly display |
Olympus TG-860 vs Samsung SL202 Physical Comparison
In case you're going to carry your camera often, you are going to need to take into account its weight and proportions. The Olympus TG-860 has outer dimensions of 110mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") having a weight of 224 grams (0.49 lbs) whilst the Samsung SL202 has measurements of 92mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") having a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs).
Examine the Olympus TG-860 versus Samsung SL202 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are employing at that time. Here is a front view dimensions comparison of the TG-860 and the SL202.

Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the TG-860 and SL202 is 91 and 94 respectively.
Olympus TG-860 vs Samsung SL202 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, its tough to visualize the gap between sensor sizing only by reading through a spec sheet. The photograph here should give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the TG-860 and SL202.
As you can see, both cameras feature the identical sensor size but different megapixels. You should anticipate the Olympus TG-860 to give you more detail due to its extra 6MP. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop pics way more aggressively. The fresher TG-860 should have a benefit when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus TG-860 vs Samsung SL202 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Olympus TG-860 vs Samsung SL202 Specifications
| Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 | Samsung SL202 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 | Samsung SL202 |
| Also referred to as | - | PL50 |
| Type | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2015-02-06 | 2009-02-17 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | TruePic VII | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 10MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 125 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 21-105mm (5.0x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.7 | f/2.8-5.7 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Screen resolution | 460 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 8s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1500s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 7.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.00 m (at ISO 1600) | 4.60 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, off, LED illuminator | Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (60p) | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | Yes | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 224 gr (0.49 pounds) | 168 gr (0.37 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 110 x 64 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") | 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 shots | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | Li-50B | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) | Yes |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Launch price | $279 | $140 |