Olympus TG-860 vs Samsung SL620
91 Imaging
40 Features
42 Overall
40
94 Imaging
34 Features
13 Overall
25
Olympus TG-860 vs Samsung SL620 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 224g - 110 x 64 x 28mm
- Announced February 2015
- Updated by Olympus TG-870
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-175mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
- 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
- Revealed February 2009
- Alternative Name is PL65
Olympus TG-860 vs Samsung SL620 Overview
In this write-up, we are analyzing the Olympus TG-860 versus Samsung SL620, former being a Waterproof while the other is a Ultracompact by manufacturers Olympus and Samsung. There is a sizable difference between the image resolutions of the TG-860 (16MP) and SL620 (12MP) but they possess the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe TG-860 was unveiled 6 years later than the SL620 and that is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras offer the identical body type (Ultracompact).
Before going straight into a full comparison, below is a concise view of how the TG-860 matches up against the SL620 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus TG-860 vs Samsung SL620 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 & Samsung SL620. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus TG-860 Gallery & Samsung SL620 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-860 over the Samsung SL620
TG-860 | SL620 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | February 2015 | February 2009 | More recent by 73 months | |
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 460k | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL620 over the Olympus TG-860
SL620 | TG-860 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus TG-860 and Samsung SL620
TG-860 | SL620 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Lack of manual focusing | |||
Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Lack of Touch display |
Olympus TG-860 vs Samsung SL620 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to lug around your camera regularly, you will need to consider its weight and size. The Olympus TG-860 comes with physical measurements of 110mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") having a weight of 224 grams (0.49 lbs) while the Samsung SL620 has specifications of 92mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") along with a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs).
Check the Olympus TG-860 versus Samsung SL620 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have attached during that time. Below is the front view physical size comparison of the TG-860 compared to the SL620.
Using size and weight, the portability rating of the TG-860 and SL620 is 91 and 94 respectively.
Olympus TG-860 vs Samsung SL620 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is difficult to envision the contrast between sensor measurements merely by reading through specifications. The graphic here might give you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the TG-860 and SL620.
Plainly, each of these cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing but not the same MP. You can anticipate the Olympus TG-860 to give you extra detail having an extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also help you crop pics a little more aggressively. The younger TG-860 is going to have an edge when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus TG-860 vs Samsung SL620 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus TG-860 vs Samsung SL620 Specifications
Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 | Samsung SL620 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Samsung |
Model type | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 | Samsung SL620 |
Also called as | - | PL65 |
Class | Waterproof | Ultracompact |
Announced | 2015-02-06 | 2009-02-17 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic VII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 12MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
Min native ISO | 125 | 80 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 21-105mm (5.0x) | 35-175mm (5.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.5-5.7 | f/2.8-5.7 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
Resolution of display | 460k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 7.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.00 m (at ISO 1600) | 4.60 m |
Flash options | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, off, LED illuminator | Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (60p) | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video data format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Yes | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 224 grams (0.49 pounds) | 168 grams (0.37 pounds) |
Dimensions | 110 x 64 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") | 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 pictures | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | Li-50B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Cost at release | $279 | $200 |