Olympus TG-860 vs Samsung SL720
91 Imaging
41 Features
42 Overall
41
94 Imaging
35 Features
14 Overall
26
Olympus TG-860 vs Samsung SL720 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 224g - 110 x 64 x 28mm
- Released February 2015
- Later Model is Olympus TG-870
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
- 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
- Released July 2009
- Alternate Name is PL70
Olympus TG-860 vs Samsung SL720 Overview
Its time to examine more closely at the Olympus TG-860 and Samsung SL720, one being a Waterproof and the latter is a Ultracompact by rivals Olympus and Samsung. There is a huge difference between the sensor resolutions of the TG-860 (16MP) and SL720 (12MP) but they possess the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe TG-860 was manufactured 5 years later than the SL720 and that is quite a significant gap as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras offer the identical body type (Ultracompact).
Before delving through a detailed comparison, below is a brief view of how the TG-860 grades against the SL720 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus TG-860 vs Samsung SL720 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 and Samsung SL720. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus TG-860 Gallery and Samsung SL720 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-860 over the Samsung SL720
TG-860 | SL720 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2015 | July 2009 | More recent by 68 months | |
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL720 over the Olympus TG-860
SL720 | TG-860 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus TG-860 and Samsung SL720
TG-860 | SL720 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | No manual focusing | |||
Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Missing Touch friendly screen |
Olympus TG-860 vs Samsung SL720 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to lug around your camera frequently, you are going to need to factor in its weight and proportions. The Olympus TG-860 provides external dimensions of 110mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") with a weight of 224 grams (0.49 lbs) while the Samsung SL720 has measurements of 92mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") along with a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus TG-860 and Samsung SL720 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you select at that moment. Following is the front view measurement comparison of the TG-860 vs the SL720.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the TG-860 and SL720 is 91 and 94 respectively.
Olympus TG-860 vs Samsung SL720 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is tough to visualise the gap between sensor measurements simply by going over specs. The visual underneath will help provide you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the TG-860 and SL720.
All in all, the two cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same MP. You should expect the Olympus TG-860 to deliver greater detail due to its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also help you crop shots far more aggressively. The fresher TG-860 will have an edge with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus TG-860 vs Samsung SL720 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus TG-860 vs Samsung SL720 Specifications
Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 | Samsung SL720 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Samsung |
Model type | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 | Samsung SL720 |
Also Known as | - | PL70 |
Class | Waterproof | Ultracompact |
Released | 2015-02-06 | 2009-07-14 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic VII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
Lowest native ISO | 125 | 80 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 21-105mm (5.0x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.5-5.7 | f/2.8-5.7 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3" | 2.7" |
Screen resolution | 460k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 8s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1500s |
Continuous shooting speed | 7.0 frames per second | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.00 m (at ISO 1600) | 4.60 m |
Flash modes | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, off, LED illuminator | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (60p) | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video data format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Yes | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 224g (0.49 lb) | 168g (0.37 lb) |
Dimensions | 110 x 64 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") | 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 images | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | Li-50B | SLB-10A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch cost | $279 | $119 |