Olympus TG-860 vs Samsung WB250F
91 Imaging
40 Features
42 Overall
40
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/042ab/042ab9bda5359b24c15525e105c8dbb85792e213" alt="Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 front Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6f3d0/6f3d00d7c30cb034b59ae160397ff233ae021e98" alt="Samsung WB250F front Samsung WB250F front"
93 Imaging
38 Features
44 Overall
40
Olympus TG-860 vs Samsung WB250F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 224g - 110 x 64 x 28mm
- Announced February 2015
- Replacement is Olympus TG-870
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-432mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 226g - 106 x 62 x 22mm
- Launched January 2013
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus TG-860 vs Samsung WB250F Overview
Following is a extensive review of the Olympus TG-860 versus Samsung WB250F, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Olympus and Samsung. The image resolution of the TG-860 (16MP) and the WB250F (14MP) is pretty comparable and they come with the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
The TG-860 was introduced 2 years after the WB250F which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus TG-860 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung WB250F being a Compact camera.
Before diving in to a full comparison, below is a brief highlight of how the TG-860 grades against the WB250F when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus TG-860 vs Samsung WB250F Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 & Samsung WB250F. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus TG-860 Gallery & Samsung WB250F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-860 over the Samsung WB250F
TG-860 | WB250F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2015 | ![]() | January 2013 | More modern by 26 months |
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB250F over the Olympus TG-860
WB250F | TG-860 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus TG-860 and Samsung WB250F
TG-860 | WB250F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Lack of manual focus | ||
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical screen measurement |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 460k | Exact same screen resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither comes with selfie screen |
Olympus TG-860 vs Samsung WB250F Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to carry around your camera frequently, you'll have to take into account its weight and measurements. The Olympus TG-860 comes with external dimensions of 110mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") and a weight of 224 grams (0.49 lbs) and the Samsung WB250F has proportions of 106mm x 62mm x 22mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") with a weight of 226 grams (0.50 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus TG-860 versus Samsung WB250F in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you have chosen at that moment. Following is the front view over all size comparison of the TG-860 against the WB250F.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/44bc1/44bc1f77eecd65c6641b0eb423f1d09e677c67bf" alt="Olympus TG-860 vs Samsung WB250F size comparison Olympus TG-860 vs Samsung WB250F size comparison"
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the TG-860 and WB250F is 91 and 93 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5ddef/5ddef331975436037938334f81d4ac2a3aefee81" alt="Olympus TG-860 vs Samsung WB250F top view buttons comparison Olympus TG-860 vs Samsung WB250F top view buttons comparison"
Olympus TG-860 vs Samsung WB250F Sensor Comparison
Normally, its hard to visualize the gap in sensor sizes purely by checking out technical specs. The picture below should provide you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the TG-860 and WB250F.
As you can tell, both of the cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit different MP. You can expect the Olympus TG-860 to provide greater detail using its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop shots much more aggressively. The newer TG-860 should have an advantage in sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/053b6/053b6c82345183b56c277e1384fd7a8197888454" alt="Olympus TG-860 vs Samsung WB250F sensor size comparison Olympus TG-860 vs Samsung WB250F sensor size comparison"
Olympus TG-860 vs Samsung WB250F Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a8cff/a8cff8628d77fd8212242138e3428018fe9e044c" alt="Olympus TG-860 vs Samsung WB250F Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus TG-860 vs Samsung WB250F Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus TG-860 vs Samsung WB250F Specifications
Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 | Samsung WB250F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Samsung |
Model | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 | Samsung WB250F |
Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2015-02-06 | 2013-01-07 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic VII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4320 x 3240 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 125 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 21-105mm (5.0x) | 24-432mm (18.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.5-5.7 | f/3.2-5.8 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 460 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Display technology | - | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 16 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 7.0fps | 8.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 4.00 m (at ISO 1600) | - |
Flash options | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, off, LED illuminator | - |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (60p) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Yes | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 224g (0.49 lbs) | 226g (0.50 lbs) |
Dimensions | 110 x 64 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") | 106 x 62 x 22mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 pictures | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | Li-50B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) | Yes |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Cost at launch | $279 | $250 |