Olympus TG-860 vs Samsung WB350F
91 Imaging
40 Features
42 Overall
40
90 Imaging
40 Features
46 Overall
42
Olympus TG-860 vs Samsung WB350F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 224g - 110 x 64 x 28mm
- Announced February 2015
- Replacement is Olympus TG-870
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 276g - 114 x 65 x 25mm
- Revealed January 2014
Olympus TG-860 vs Samsung WB350F Overview
Below, we will be evaluating the Olympus TG-860 versus Samsung WB350F, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Olympus and Samsung. The image resolution of the TG-860 (16MP) and the WB350F (16MP) is relatively well matched and they enjoy the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe TG-860 was unveiled 14 months later than the WB350F which makes the cameras a generation apart from each other. Both cameras come with different body type with the Olympus TG-860 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung WB350F being a Compact camera.
Before going in to a complete comparison, below is a concise synopsis of how the TG-860 scores vs the WB350F in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus TG-860 vs Samsung WB350F Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 & Samsung WB350F. The full galleries are provided at Olympus TG-860 Gallery & Samsung WB350F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-860 over the Samsung WB350F
TG-860 | WB350F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | February 2015 | January 2014 | Fresher by 14 months | |
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB350F over the Olympus TG-860
WB350F | TG-860 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | More exact focus | |||
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus TG-860 and Samsung WB350F
TG-860 | WB350F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical screen sizing | |
Screen resolution | 460k | 460k | Same screen resolution | |
Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen |
Olympus TG-860 vs Samsung WB350F Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to carry your camera often, you should consider its weight and volume. The Olympus TG-860 has got exterior dimensions of 110mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") and a weight of 224 grams (0.49 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB350F has sizing of 114mm x 65mm x 25mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.0") having a weight of 276 grams (0.61 lbs).
Look at the Olympus TG-860 versus Samsung WB350F in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are using at that time. Below is the front view size comparison of the TG-860 compared to the WB350F.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the TG-860 and WB350F is 91 and 90 respectively.
Olympus TG-860 vs Samsung WB350F Sensor Comparison
Usually, it's tough to visualize the difference between sensor sizing only by reading through specs. The photograph below will help provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the TG-860 and WB350F.
All in all, both of these cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements and the exact same MP and you can expect similar quality of photos although you really should consider the launch date of the products into consideration. The newer TG-860 should have an edge in sensor technology.
Olympus TG-860 vs Samsung WB350F Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus TG-860 vs Samsung WB350F Specifications
Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 | Samsung WB350F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Samsung |
Model type | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 | Samsung WB350F |
Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2015-02-06 | 2014-01-07 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic VII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 125 | 80 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 21-105mm (5.0x) | 23-483mm (21.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.5-5.7 | f/2.8-5.9 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 460k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 16 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 7.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.00 m (at ISO 1600) | - |
Flash settings | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, off, LED illuminator | - |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (60p) | 1920 x 1080 |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | H.264 | - |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Yes | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 224 grams (0.49 pounds) | 276 grams (0.61 pounds) |
Dimensions | 110 x 64 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") | 114 x 65 x 25mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 photos | - |
Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | Li-50B | SLB-10A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) | - |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Price at release | $279 | $260 |