Olympus TG-870 vs Olympus VG-160
91 Imaging
40 Features
46 Overall
42
96 Imaging
37 Features
26 Overall
32
Olympus TG-870 vs Olympus VG-160 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 125 - 6400 (Push to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 221g - 113 x 64 x 28mm
- Introduced January 2016
- Replaced the Olympus TG-860
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 125g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Announced January 2012
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus TG-870 vs Olympus VG-160 Overview
Lets look closer at the Olympus TG-870 vs Olympus VG-160, former is a Ultracompact while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact and they are both manufactured by Olympus. The resolution of the TG-870 (16MP) and the VG-160 (14MP) is relatively well matched and both cameras posses the identical sensor size (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe TG-870 was launched 4 years after the VG-160 which is quite a big difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus TG-870 being a Ultracompact camera and the Olympus VG-160 being a Compact camera.
Before going right into a more detailed comparison, here is a short synopsis of how the TG-870 scores against the VG-160 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photography Glossary Olympus TG-870 vs Olympus VG-160 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 & Olympus VG-160. The complete galleries are available at Olympus TG-870 Gallery & Olympus VG-160 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-870 over the Olympus VG-160
| TG-870 | VG-160 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2016 |  | January 2012 | More modern by 49 months |
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting screen |
| Screen resolution | 921k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+691k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-160 over the Olympus TG-870
| VG-160 | TG-870 |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus TG-870 and Olympus VG-160
| TG-870 | VG-160 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Lack of manual focus | ||
| Screen size | 3" |  | 3" | Same screen size |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither has selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Absent Touch screen |
Olympus TG-870 vs Olympus VG-160 Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to carry around your camera, you're going to have to factor in its weight and proportions. The Olympus TG-870 has outside dimensions of 113mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.1") and a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs) while the Olympus VG-160 has measurements of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") and a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs).
Look at the Olympus TG-870 vs Olympus VG-160 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are working with at that time. Below is a front view dimension comparison of the TG-870 versus the VG-160.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the TG-870 and VG-160 is 91 and 96 respectively.
Olympus TG-870 vs Olympus VG-160 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is hard to see the difference between sensor sizes only by checking technical specs. The picture underneath might offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the TG-870 and VG-160.
As you have seen, the 2 cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit not the same resolution. You can count on the Olympus TG-870 to resolve more detail utilizing its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop shots a good deal more aggressively. The newer TG-870 will have an edge when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus TG-870 vs Olympus VG-160 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Olympus TG-870 vs Olympus VG-160 Specifications
| Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 | Olympus VG-160 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 | Olympus VG-160 |
| Class | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2016-01-06 | 2012-01-10 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic VII | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 14MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Max boosted ISO | 12800 | - |
| Min native ISO | 125 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 21-105mm (5.0x) | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.5-5.7 | f/2.8-6.5 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 7cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 921 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Display technology | - | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 7.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.00 m (at ISO 1600) | 4.80 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, off, LED illuminator | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (60p) | 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 221g (0.49 lbs) | 125g (0.28 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 113 x 64 x 28mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.1") | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 pictures | 165 pictures |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | Li-50B | LI-70B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD/SDHC |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Pricing at launch | $280 | $90 |