Olympus TG-870 vs Olympus VG-160
91 Imaging
40 Features
46 Overall
42
96 Imaging
37 Features
26 Overall
32
Olympus TG-870 vs Olympus VG-160 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 125 - 6400 (Push to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 221g - 113 x 64 x 28mm
- Introduced January 2016
- Replaced the Olympus TG-860
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 125g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Announced January 2012
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus TG-870 vs Olympus VG-160 Overview
Lets look closer at the Olympus TG-870 vs Olympus VG-160, former is a Ultracompact while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact and they are both manufactured by Olympus. The resolution of the TG-870 (16MP) and the VG-160 (14MP) is relatively well matched and both cameras posses the identical sensor size (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe TG-870 was launched 4 years after the VG-160 which is quite a big difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus TG-870 being a Ultracompact camera and the Olympus VG-160 being a Compact camera.
Before going right into a more detailed comparison, here is a short synopsis of how the TG-870 scores against the VG-160 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus TG-870 vs Olympus VG-160 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 & Olympus VG-160. The complete galleries are available at Olympus TG-870 Gallery & Olympus VG-160 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-870 over the Olympus VG-160
| TG-870 | VG-160 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2016 |  | January 2012 | More modern by 49 months |
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting screen |
| Screen resolution | 921k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+691k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-160 over the Olympus TG-870
| VG-160 | TG-870 |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus TG-870 and Olympus VG-160
| TG-870 | VG-160 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Lack of manual focus | ||
| Screen size | 3" |  | 3" | Same screen size |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither has selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Absent Touch screen |
Olympus TG-870 vs Olympus VG-160 Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to carry around your camera, you're going to have to factor in its weight and proportions. The Olympus TG-870 has outside dimensions of 113mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.1") and a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs) while the Olympus VG-160 has measurements of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") and a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs).
Look at the Olympus TG-870 vs Olympus VG-160 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are working with at that time. Below is a front view dimension comparison of the TG-870 versus the VG-160.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the TG-870 and VG-160 is 91 and 96 respectively.
Olympus TG-870 vs Olympus VG-160 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is hard to see the difference between sensor sizes only by checking technical specs. The picture underneath might offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the TG-870 and VG-160.
As you have seen, the 2 cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit not the same resolution. You can count on the Olympus TG-870 to resolve more detail utilizing its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop shots a good deal more aggressively. The newer TG-870 will have an edge when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus TG-870 vs Olympus VG-160 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Olympus TG-870 vs Olympus VG-160 Specifications
| Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 | Olympus VG-160 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 | Olympus VG-160 |
| Class | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2016-01-06 | 2012-01-10 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic VII | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 14MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Max boosted ISO | 12800 | - |
| Min native ISO | 125 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 21-105mm (5.0x) | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.5-5.7 | f/2.8-6.5 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 7cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 921 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Display technology | - | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 7.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.00 m (at ISO 1600) | 4.80 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, off, LED illuminator | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (60p) | 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 221g (0.49 lbs) | 125g (0.28 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 113 x 64 x 28mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.1") | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 pictures | 165 pictures |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | Li-50B | LI-70B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD/SDHC |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Pricing at launch | $280 | $90 |