Olympus TG-870 vs Olympus VH-515
91 Imaging
41 Features
46 Overall
43
95 Imaging
36 Features
34 Overall
35
Olympus TG-870 vs Olympus VH-515 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 125 - 6400 (Expand to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 221g - 113 x 64 x 28mm
- Launched January 2016
- Superseded the Olympus TG-860
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 152g - 102 x 60 x 21mm
- Revealed August 2012
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus TG-870 vs Olympus VH-515 Overview
Here is a in-depth analysis of the Olympus TG-870 vs Olympus VH-515, former being a Ultracompact while the other is a Small Sensor Compact and both of them are built by Olympus. There is a large difference between the image resolutions of the TG-870 (16MP) and VH-515 (12MP) but they come with the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe TG-870 was brought out 3 years later than the VH-515 and that is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus TG-870 being a Ultracompact camera and the Olympus VH-515 being a Compact camera.
Before we go in to a more detailed comparison, below is a short synopsis of how the TG-870 grades vs the VH-515 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus TG-870 vs Olympus VH-515 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 & Olympus VH-515. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus TG-870 Gallery & Olympus VH-515 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-870 over the Olympus VH-515
| TG-870 | VH-515 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2016 |  | August 2012 | Fresher by 42 months |
| Display type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting display |
| Display resolution | 921k |  | 460k | Sharper display (+461k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus VH-515 over the Olympus TG-870
| VH-515 | TG-870 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus TG-870 and Olympus VH-515
| TG-870 | VH-515 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | No manual focusing | ||
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent display sizing |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen |
Olympus TG-870 vs Olympus VH-515 Physical Comparison
When you are intending to carry your camera regularly, you will have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus TG-870 has exterior measurements of 113mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.1") along with a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs) whilst the Olympus VH-515 has dimensions of 102mm x 60mm x 21mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.8") having a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus TG-870 vs Olympus VH-515 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you have chosen at that time. Following is the front view proportions comparison of the TG-870 against the VH-515.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the TG-870 and VH-515 is 91 and 95 respectively.
Olympus TG-870 vs Olympus VH-515 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is hard to visualise the difference between sensor sizing simply by going over a spec sheet. The visual below might give you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the TG-870 and VH-515.
Clearly, each of these cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but not the same resolution. You can expect to see the Olympus TG-870 to offer you more detail having its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop images far more aggressively. The newer TG-870 is going to have an edge when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus TG-870 vs Olympus VH-515 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Olympus TG-870 vs Olympus VH-515 Specifications
| Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 | Olympus VH-515 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model type | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 | Olympus VH-515 |
| Type | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2016-01-06 | 2012-08-21 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic VII | TruePic III+ |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Max enhanced ISO | 12800 | - |
| Minimum native ISO | 125 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 21-105mm (5.0x) | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.5-5.7 | f/2.8-6.5 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 921k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Display tech | - | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 7.0 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.00 m (at ISO 1600) | 4.70 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, off, LED illuminator | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (60p) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 221 grams (0.49 lb) | 152 grams (0.34 lb) |
| Dimensions | 113 x 64 x 28mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.1") | 102 x 60 x 21mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 shots | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | Li-50B | LI-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Cost at release | $280 | $648 |