Olympus TG-870 vs Olympus VR-320
91 Imaging
41 Features
46 Overall
43
94 Imaging
37 Features
35 Overall
36
Olympus TG-870 vs Olympus VR-320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400 (Expand to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 221g - 113 x 64 x 28mm
- Announced January 2016
- Superseded the Olympus TG-860
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Launched July 2011
- Newer Model is Olympus VR-330
Olympus TG-870 vs Olympus VR-320 Overview
In this write-up, we are looking at the Olympus TG-870 vs Olympus VR-320, one is a Ultracompact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both of them are offered by Olympus. The resolution of the TG-870 (16MP) and the VR-320 (14MP) is fairly well matched and they enjoy the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe TG-870 was unveiled 4 years after the VR-320 which is quite a serious gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus TG-870 being a Ultracompact camera and the Olympus VR-320 being a Compact camera.
Before we go through a step-by-step comparison, below is a short introduction of how the TG-870 scores vs the VR-320 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus TG-870 vs Olympus VR-320 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 and Olympus VR-320. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus TG-870 Gallery and Olympus VR-320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-870 over the Olympus VR-320
TG-870 | VR-320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2016 | July 2011 | More modern by 55 months | |
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display resolution | 921k | 230k | Sharper display (+691k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Olympus TG-870
VR-320 | TG-870 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus TG-870 and Olympus VR-320
TG-870 | VR-320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Lack of manual focus | |||
Display sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent display sizing | |
Selfie screen | Neither comes with selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Neither comes with Touch display |
Olympus TG-870 vs Olympus VR-320 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to carry around your camera regularly, you'll need to take into account its weight and size. The Olympus TG-870 comes with outer dimensions of 113mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.1") having a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs) while the Olympus VR-320 has specifications of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).
Look at the Olympus TG-870 vs Olympus VR-320 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you have attached at the time. Underneath is the front view dimensions comparison of the TG-870 vs the VR-320.
Using size and weight, the portability grade of the TG-870 and VR-320 is 91 and 94 respectively.
Olympus TG-870 vs Olympus VR-320 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is hard to envision the difference between sensor sizes merely by looking at specifications. The pic here may offer you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the TG-870 and VR-320.
To sum up, both cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but not the same MP. You should anticipate the Olympus TG-870 to give you extra detail having an extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop photos far more aggressively. The younger TG-870 is going to have a benefit when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus TG-870 vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus TG-870 vs Olympus VR-320 Specifications
Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 | Olympus VR-320 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 | Olympus VR-320 |
Type | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2016-01-06 | 2011-07-19 |
Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic VII | TruePic III |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
Maximum boosted ISO | 12800 | - |
Min native ISO | 125 | 80 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 21-105mm (5.0x) | 24-300mm (12.5x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.5-5.7 | f/3.0-5.9 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 921 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 7.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.00 m (at ISO 1600) | 4.70 m |
Flash options | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, off, LED illuminator | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (60p) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 221 gr (0.49 lbs) | 158 gr (0.35 lbs) |
Dimensions | 113 x 64 x 28mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.1") | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 photos | - |
Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | Li-50B | LI-42B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD/SDHC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch pricing | $280 | $179 |