Clicky

Olympus TG-870 vs Olympus VR-320

Portability
91
Imaging
41
Features
46
Overall
43
Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 front
 
Olympus VR-320 front
Portability
94
Imaging
37
Features
35
Overall
36

Olympus TG-870 vs Olympus VR-320 Key Specs

Olympus TG-870
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 125 - 6400 (Expand to 12800)
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
  • 221g - 113 x 64 x 28mm
  • Announced January 2016
  • Superseded the Olympus TG-860
Olympus VR-320
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
  • 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
  • Launched July 2011
  • Newer Model is Olympus VR-330
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Olympus TG-870 vs Olympus VR-320 Overview

In this write-up, we are looking at the Olympus TG-870 vs Olympus VR-320, one is a Ultracompact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both of them are offered by Olympus. The resolution of the TG-870 (16MP) and the VR-320 (14MP) is fairly well matched and they enjoy the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The TG-870 was unveiled 4 years after the VR-320 which is quite a serious gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus TG-870 being a Ultracompact camera and the Olympus VR-320 being a Compact camera.

Before we go through a step-by-step comparison, below is a short introduction of how the TG-870 scores vs the VR-320 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus TG-870 over the Olympus VR-320

 TG-870 VR-320 
LaunchedJanuary 2016July 2011More modern by 55 months
Display typeTiltingFixed Tilting display
Display resolution921k230kSharper display (+691k dot)

Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Olympus TG-870

 VR-320 TG-870 

Common features in the Olympus TG-870 and Olympus VR-320

 TG-870 VR-320 
Manually focus Lack of manual focus
Display sizing3"3"Equivalent display sizing
Selfie screen Neither comes with selfie screen
Touch display Neither comes with Touch display

Olympus TG-870 vs Olympus VR-320 Physical Comparison

For anyone who is aiming to carry around your camera regularly, you'll need to take into account its weight and size. The Olympus TG-870 comes with outer dimensions of 113mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.1") having a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs) while the Olympus VR-320 has specifications of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).

Look at the Olympus TG-870 vs Olympus VR-320 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you have attached at the time. Underneath is the front view dimensions comparison of the TG-870 vs the VR-320.

Olympus TG-870 vs Olympus VR-320 size comparison

Using size and weight, the portability grade of the TG-870 and VR-320 is 91 and 94 respectively.

Olympus TG-870 vs Olympus VR-320 top view buttons comparison

Olympus TG-870 vs Olympus VR-320 Sensor Comparison

Usually, it is hard to envision the difference between sensor sizes merely by looking at specifications. The pic here may offer you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the TG-870 and VR-320.

To sum up, both cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but not the same MP. You should anticipate the Olympus TG-870 to give you extra detail having an extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop photos far more aggressively. The younger TG-870 is going to have a benefit when it comes to sensor technology.

Olympus TG-870 vs Olympus VR-320 sensor size comparison

Olympus TG-870 vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus TG-870 vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photography Glossary

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus TG-870 Portrait photography factors
Olympus VR-320 Portrait photography factors
36
decent MP (16MP)
features face detection focusing
no manual focus
no manual control
no external flash support
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
33
sensor resolution is decent (14 megapixels)
offers face detect autofocus
focusing manually not possible
no manual exposure
external flash not possible
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Olympus TG-870 Street photography highlights
Olympus VR-320 Street photography highlights
65
tilting screen
image stabilization (Optical)
environment proof
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
heavier than competition in class (221g)
62
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than others in class (158g)
fixed screen
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sports Comparison

Olympus TG-870 Sports photography features
Olympus VR-320 Sports photography features
51
image stabilization (Optical)
decent MP (16MP)
features tracking autofocus
environment proof
better than average battery (300 shots)
lack of shutter priority mode
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect AF
47
excellent zoom range (24-300mm 12.5 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sensor resolution is decent (14MP)
offers tracking focus
no shutter priority mode
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect autofocus
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

Travel Comparison

Olympus TG-870 Travel photography factors
Olympus VR-320 Travel photography factors
69
better than average battery (300 per charge)
environment proof
decent MP (16MP)
has built in flash
really wide (21mm)
heavier than competition in class (221 grams)
screen is not selfie friendly
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
70
lighter than others in class (158g)
sensor resolution is decent (14 megapixels)
flash built-in
pretty wide (24mm)
long reach (300mm)
lack of Timelapse mode
screen is not selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.0)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Landscape Comparison

Olympus TG-870 Landscape photography advice
Olympus VR-320 Landscape photography advice
50
really wide (21mm)
pretty good screen size (3")
image stabilization (Optical)
decent MP (16 megapixels)
environment proof
better than average battery (300 shots)
no manual focus
can't swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
no manual control
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
42
pretty wide (24mm)
screen size is good (3")
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sensor resolution is decent (14 megapixels)
focusing manually not possible
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.0)
no manual exposure
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
lack of Timelapse mode
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus TG-870 Vlogging information
Olympus VR-320 Vlogging information
32
really wide (21mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
features face detection focusing
high res video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
screen is not selfie friendly
missing external mic port
heavier than competition in class (221g)
32
pretty wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
offers face detect autofocus
lighter than others in class (158 grams)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.0)
screen is not selfie friendly
low video resolution (1280 x 720 pixels)
lack of microphone support
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Olympus TG-870 vs Olympus VR-320 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus TG-870 and Olympus VR-320
 Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870Olympus VR-320
General Information
Brand Name Olympus Olympus
Model type Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 Olympus VR-320
Type Ultracompact Small Sensor Superzoom
Announced 2016-01-06 2011-07-19
Physical type Ultracompact Compact
Sensor Information
Processor TruePic VII TruePic III
Sensor type BSI-CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixel 14 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3
Maximum resolution 4608 x 3456 4288 x 3216
Maximum native ISO 6400 1600
Maximum boosted ISO 12800 -
Min native ISO 125 80
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
Continuous AF
Single AF
Tracking AF
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 21-105mm (5.0x) 24-300mm (12.5x)
Largest aperture f/3.5-5.7 f/3.0-5.9
Macro focusing distance 1cm 1cm
Crop factor 5.8 5.8
Screen
Screen type Tilting Fixed Type
Screen size 3 inch 3 inch
Resolution of screen 921 thousand dots 230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Screen tech - TFT Color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 4 secs 4 secs
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shooting rate 7.0 frames/s -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 4.00 m (at ISO 1600) 4.70 m
Flash options Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, off, LED illuminator Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
External flash
AEB
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (60p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (60p) 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps)
Maximum video resolution 1920x1080 1280x720
Video file format MPEG-4, H.264 Motion JPEG
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS BuiltIn None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 221 gr (0.49 lbs) 158 gr (0.35 lbs)
Dimensions 113 x 64 x 28mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.1") 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 300 photos -
Battery style Battery Pack -
Battery ID Li-50B LI-42B
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal SD/SDHC
Card slots Single Single
Launch pricing $280 $179