Olympus TG-870 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS
91 Imaging
41 Features
46 Overall
43
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
Olympus TG-870 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 125 - 6400 (Raise to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 221g - 113 x 64 x 28mm
- Revealed January 2016
- Previous Model is Olympus TG-860
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Released December 2012
Olympus TG-870 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Overview
Below, we are reviewing the Olympus TG-870 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS, one is a Ultracompact and the other is a Small Sensor Compact and both are produced by Olympus. There is a sizeable difference between the image resolutions of the TG-870 (16MP) and XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and the TG-870 (1/2.3") and XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") enjoy different sensor sizing.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe TG-870 was unveiled 3 years after the XZ-2 iHS which is quite a large gap as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus TG-870 being a Ultracompact camera and the Olympus XZ-2 iHS being a Compact camera.
Before going through a detailed comparison, below is a brief summation of how the TG-870 grades against the XZ-2 iHS for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus TG-870 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS. The full galleries are available at Olympus TG-870 Gallery and Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-870 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
TG-870 | XZ-2 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2016 | December 2012 | Newer by 38 months | |
Display resolution | 921k | 920k | Crisper display (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Olympus TG-870
XZ-2 iHS | TG-870 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | More exact focus | |||
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus TG-870 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS
TG-870 | XZ-2 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Tilting | Tilting | Tilting display | |
Display dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical display measurement | |
Selfie screen | Neither offers selfie screen |
Olympus TG-870 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Physical Comparison
When you are intending to travel with your camera often, you should consider its weight and proportions. The Olympus TG-870 offers external measurements of 113mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs) whilst the Olympus XZ-2 iHS has measurements of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") having a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus TG-870 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are utilizing at the time. Below is the front view over all size comparison of the TG-870 compared to the XZ-2 iHS.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the TG-870 and XZ-2 iHS is 91 and 85 respectively.
Olympus TG-870 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Sensor Comparison
Often, it is very hard to imagine the contrast between sensor dimensions only by checking a spec sheet. The pic below should provide you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the TG-870 and XZ-2 iHS.
As you can see, both the cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The TG-870 using its tinier sensor is going to make shooting shallow DOF more difficult and the Olympus TG-870 will give extra detail having an extra 4MP. Greater resolution will enable you to crop photos somewhat more aggressively. The fresher TG-870 should have an advantage with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus TG-870 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus TG-870 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Specifications
Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 | Olympus XZ-2 iHS |
Type | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2016-01-06 | 2012-12-18 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic VII | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3968 x 2976 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 12800 |
Max boosted ISO | 12800 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 125 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | - | 35 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 21-105mm (5.0x) | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
Max aperture | f/3.5-5.7 | f/1.8-2.5 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Tilting | Tilting |
Display diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 921 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 60s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 7.0 frames per second | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 4.00 m (at ISO 1600) | 8.60 m (ISO 800) |
Flash options | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, off, LED illuminator | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (60p) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 221g (0.49 lb) | 346g (0.76 lb) |
Dimensions | 113 x 64 x 28mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.1") | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 49 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 20.4 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.3 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 216 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 images | 340 images |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | Li-50B | Li-90B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Retail cost | $280 | $450 |