Olympus TG-870 vs Panasonic FZ1000 II
91 Imaging
41 Features
46 Overall
43
55 Imaging
54 Features
82 Overall
65
Olympus TG-870 vs Panasonic FZ1000 II Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400 (Boost to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 221g - 113 x 64 x 28mm
- Revealed January 2016
- Older Model is Olympus TG-860
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Raise to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-400mm (F2.8-4.0) lens
- 808g - 136 x 97 x 132mm
- Released February 2019
- Succeeded the Panasonic FZ1000
Olympus TG-870 vs Panasonic FZ1000 II Overview
Following is a complete comparison of the Olympus TG-870 vs Panasonic FZ1000 II, former is a Ultracompact while the latter is a Large Sensor Superzoom by companies Olympus and Panasonic. The sensor resolution of the TG-870 (16MP) and the FZ1000 II (20MP) is pretty comparable but the TG-870 (1/2.3") and FZ1000 II (1") use different sensor dimensions.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe TG-870 was announced 4 years prior to the FZ1000 II which is a fairly significant difference as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras come with different body type with the Olympus TG-870 being a Ultracompact camera and the Panasonic FZ1000 II being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before delving through a step-by-step comparison, below is a brief view of how the TG-870 grades versus the FZ1000 II with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus TG-870 vs Panasonic FZ1000 II Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 & Panasonic Lumix DC-FZ1000 II. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus TG-870 Gallery & Panasonic FZ1000 II Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-870 over the Panasonic FZ1000 II
TG-870 | FZ1000 II |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ1000 II over the Olympus TG-870
FZ1000 II | TG-870 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2019 | January 2016 | More modern by 37 months | |
Manually focus | Dial precise focus | |||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Tilting | Fully Articulating screen | |
Screen resolution | 1240k | 921k | Crisper screen (+319k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies | |||
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus TG-870 and Panasonic FZ1000 II
TG-870 | FZ1000 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical screen sizing |
Olympus TG-870 vs Panasonic FZ1000 II Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to carry around your camera, you will need to consider its weight and volume. The Olympus TG-870 has outside dimensions of 113mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs) whilst the Panasonic FZ1000 II has sizing of 136mm x 97mm x 132mm (5.4" x 3.8" x 5.2") having a weight of 808 grams (1.78 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus TG-870 vs Panasonic FZ1000 II in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are utilising during that time. Here is the front view proportions comparison of the TG-870 and the FZ1000 II.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the TG-870 and FZ1000 II is 91 and 55 respectively.
Olympus TG-870 vs Panasonic FZ1000 II Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is hard to visualize the difference in sensor sizes simply by checking out a spec sheet. The image here will give you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the TG-870 and FZ1000 II.
Clearly, the 2 cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The TG-870 using its smaller sensor is going to make shooting shallow depth of field more difficult and the Panasonic FZ1000 II will produce more detail with its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop pictures somewhat more aggressively. The more aged TG-870 will be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus TG-870 vs Panasonic FZ1000 II Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus TG-870 vs Panasonic FZ1000 II Specifications
Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 | Panasonic Lumix DC-FZ1000 II | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 | Panasonic Lumix DC-FZ1000 II |
Category | Ultracompact | Large Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2016-01-06 | 2019-02-18 |
Body design | Ultracompact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic VII | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5472 x 3648 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 12800 |
Highest boosted ISO | 12800 | 25600 |
Lowest native ISO | 125 | 125 |
RAW pictures | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | - | 80 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | - | 49 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 21-105mm (5.0x) | 25-400mm (16.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.5-5.7 | f/2.8-4.0 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | 3cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Tilting | Fully Articulated |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 921 thousand dot | 1,240 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360 thousand dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.74x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 60s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Maximum silent shutter speed | - | 1/16000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 7.0fps | 12.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.00 m (at ISO 1600) | 13.50 m (with Auto ISO) |
Flash settings | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, off, LED illuminator | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync, Slow Sync/Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off, 1st / 2nd Slow Sync. |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (60p) | 3840x2160 (30p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 30p, 24p) 1280x720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 221 gr (0.49 pounds) | 808 gr (1.78 pounds) |
Dimensions | 113 x 64 x 28mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.1") | 136 x 97 x 132mm (5.4" x 3.8" x 5.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 shots | 350 shots |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | Li-50B | DMW-BLC12PP |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I supported) |
Storage slots | One | One |
Pricing at launch | $280 | $898 |