Olympus TG-870 vs Panasonic FS25
91 Imaging
41 Features
46 Overall
43
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/98cb4/98cb42e909dff8452621d79a82a9f24270e5e01f" alt="Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 front Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/47619/47619e6b1ac91a51a7449bd9802860c5373c0a46" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS25 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS25 front"
95 Imaging
34 Features
24 Overall
30
Olympus TG-870 vs Panasonic FS25 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 125 - 6400 (Boost to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 221g - 113 x 64 x 28mm
- Revealed January 2016
- Succeeded the Olympus TG-860
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600 (Increase to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 29-145mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 148g - 97 x 58 x 22mm
- Announced January 2009
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus TG-870 vs Panasonic FS25 Overview
Below is a thorough assessment of the Olympus TG-870 versus Panasonic FS25, one being a Ultracompact and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Olympus and Panasonic. There is a huge difference between the image resolutions of the TG-870 (16MP) and FS25 (12MP) but both cameras have the same sensor size (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
The TG-870 was introduced 7 years later than the FS25 and that is quite a significant gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus TG-870 being a Ultracompact camera and the Panasonic FS25 being a Compact camera.
Before getting right into a complete comparison, here is a brief highlight of how the TG-870 matches up against the FS25 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus TG-870 vs Panasonic FS25 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS25. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus TG-870 Gallery and Panasonic FS25 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-870 over the Panasonic FS25
TG-870 | FS25 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | January 2016 | ![]() | January 2009 | More recent by 85 months |
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen resolution | 921k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper screen (+691k dot) |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FS25 over the Olympus TG-870
FS25 | TG-870 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus TG-870 and Panasonic FS25
TG-870 | FS25 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Lack of manual focusing | ||
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal screen size |
Selfie screen | ![]() | No selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Neither comes with Touch friendly screen |
Olympus TG-870 vs Panasonic FS25 Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to lug around your camera frequently, you will need to consider its weight and volume. The Olympus TG-870 comes with external measurements of 113mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.1") along with a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs) while the Panasonic FS25 has sizing of 97mm x 58mm x 22mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.9") along with a weight of 148 grams (0.33 lbs).
Look at the Olympus TG-870 versus Panasonic FS25 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you select at that moment. Here is a front view physical size comparison of the TG-870 compared to the FS25.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/75596/75596f9341ed610856b6895c1fc435903cb251e0" alt="Olympus TG-870 vs Panasonic FS25 size comparison Olympus TG-870 vs Panasonic FS25 size comparison"
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the TG-870 and FS25 is 91 and 95 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/82205/82205eba9f6e08ffb8320471f39e52900cc9a7a7" alt="Olympus TG-870 vs Panasonic FS25 top view buttons comparison Olympus TG-870 vs Panasonic FS25 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus TG-870 vs Panasonic FS25 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it can be tough to visualise the contrast between sensor measurements only by reading through a spec sheet. The visual here will help give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the TG-870 and FS25.
Clearly, each of the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same megapixels. You should count on the Olympus TG-870 to give you greater detail using its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop photographs more aggressively. The more recent TG-870 is going to have an edge in sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/077fa/077fad0ba6873c672d721b1bd8f551c00c837fac" alt="Olympus TG-870 vs Panasonic FS25 sensor size comparison Olympus TG-870 vs Panasonic FS25 sensor size comparison"
Olympus TG-870 vs Panasonic FS25 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c05aa/c05aaf98396da59190cf32d9bcf3bd30bf5b8597" alt="Olympus TG-870 vs Panasonic FS25 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus TG-870 vs Panasonic FS25 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus TG-870 vs Panasonic FS25 Specifications
Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS25 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS25 |
Category | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2016-01-06 | 2009-01-27 |
Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic VII | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
Highest boosted ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 125 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | - | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 21-105mm (5.0x) | 29-145mm (5.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.5-5.7 | f/3.3-5.9 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | 5cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 921 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 60s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 7.0 frames per sec | 2.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.00 m (at ISO 1600) | 5.30 m |
Flash options | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, off, LED illuminator | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (60p) | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 221 grams (0.49 lb) | 148 grams (0.33 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 113 x 64 x 28mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.1") | 97 x 58 x 22mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 images | - |
Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | Li-50B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at launch | $280 | $230 |