Olympus TG-870 vs Panasonic FS42
91 Imaging
41 Features
46 Overall
43
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/98cb4/98cb42e909dff8452621d79a82a9f24270e5e01f" alt="Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 front Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f9979/f9979d6158b07faa33963a04f4938253f5f9ce99" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42 front"
95 Imaging
33 Features
10 Overall
23
Olympus TG-870 vs Panasonic FS42 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 125 - 6400 (Expand to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 221g - 113 x 64 x 28mm
- Released January 2016
- Older Model is Olympus TG-860
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1000 (Increase to 6400)
- 640 x 480 video
- 33-132mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 132g - 98 x 55 x 22mm
- Revealed April 2009
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus TG-870 vs Panasonic FS42 Overview
Here is a complete overview of the Olympus TG-870 and Panasonic FS42, both Ultracompact digital cameras by brands Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a noticeable gap between the sensor resolutions of the TG-870 (16MP) and FS42 (10MP) and the TG-870 (1/2.3") and FS42 (1/2.5") offer different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
The TG-870 was introduced 6 years later than the FS42 and that is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras have the same body design (Ultracompact).
Before we go straight to a full comparison, here is a brief highlight of how the TG-870 scores versus the FS42 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus TG-870 vs Panasonic FS42 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus TG-870 Gallery & Panasonic FS42 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-870 over the Panasonic FS42
TG-870 | FS42 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | January 2016 | ![]() | April 2009 | Fresher by 82 months |
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
Display resolution | 921k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper display (+691k dot) |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FS42 over the Olympus TG-870
FS42 | TG-870 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus TG-870 and Panasonic FS42
TG-870 | FS42 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | No manual focusing | ||
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Neither includes Touch display |
Olympus TG-870 vs Panasonic FS42 Physical Comparison
When you are looking to carry your camera regularly, you're going to have to consider its weight and measurements. The Olympus TG-870 features external dimensions of 113mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs) and the Panasonic FS42 has proportions of 98mm x 55mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") with a weight of 132 grams (0.29 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus TG-870 and Panasonic FS42 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you use during that time. Here is a front view scale comparison of the TG-870 vs the FS42.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8ff22/8ff2229306a5562333a70326e5a35a872ea545b8" alt="Olympus TG-870 vs Panasonic FS42 size comparison Olympus TG-870 vs Panasonic FS42 size comparison"
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the TG-870 and FS42 is 91 and 95 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cc260/cc260a497beed7d8ae408457fa783db091d90c6f" alt="Olympus TG-870 vs Panasonic FS42 top view buttons comparison Olympus TG-870 vs Panasonic FS42 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus TG-870 vs Panasonic FS42 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is tough to imagine the gap between sensor sizing purely by going over technical specs. The photograph below might give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the TG-870 and FS42.
As you have seen, the two cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The TG-870 with its larger sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF simpler and the Olympus TG-870 will offer greater detail using its extra 6MP. Greater resolution will enable you to crop pics more aggressively. The fresher TG-870 should have a benefit in sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/696f2/696f21770bd295674efd9942b695c00b5693fb40" alt="Olympus TG-870 vs Panasonic FS42 sensor size comparison Olympus TG-870 vs Panasonic FS42 sensor size comparison"
Olympus TG-870 vs Panasonic FS42 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7dfe5/7dfe57af13586724ced0f2f99cea2e7ab667cbef" alt="Olympus TG-870 vs Panasonic FS42 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus TG-870 vs Panasonic FS42 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus TG-870 vs Panasonic FS42 Specifications
Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42 |
Category | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Released | 2016-01-06 | 2009-04-17 |
Physical type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic VII | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.5" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 5.744 x 4.308mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 24.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 1000 |
Maximum boosted ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 125 | 80 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 21-105mm (5.0x) | 33-132mm (4.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.5-5.7 | f/2.8-5.9 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 5cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 6.3 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inch | 2.5 inch |
Resolution of display | 921 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 60 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 7.0 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.00 m (at ISO 1600) | 6.30 m |
Flash settings | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, off, LED illuminator | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (60p) | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 221g (0.49 lbs) | 132g (0.29 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 113 x 64 x 28mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.1") | 98 x 55 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 photos | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | Li-50B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Retail pricing | $280 | $580 |