Olympus TG-870 vs Panasonic FX75
91 Imaging
41 Features
46 Overall
43
94 Imaging
37 Features
32 Overall
35
Olympus TG-870 vs Panasonic FX75 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 125 - 6400 (Bump to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 221g - 113 x 64 x 28mm
- Launched January 2016
- Old Model is Olympus TG-860
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-120mm (F2.2-5.9) lens
- 165g - 103 x 55 x 23mm
- Launched June 2010
- Additionally Known as Lumix DMC-FX70
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus TG-870 vs Panasonic FX75 Overview
Its time to examine more closely at the Olympus TG-870 vs Panasonic FX75, former being a Ultracompact while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Olympus and Panasonic. The resolution of the TG-870 (16MP) and the FX75 (14MP) is fairly similar and they come with the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe TG-870 was announced 5 years later than the FX75 and that is quite a large difference as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras offer different body type with the Olympus TG-870 being a Ultracompact camera and the Panasonic FX75 being a Compact camera.
Before getting in to a complete comparison, below is a brief view of how the TG-870 scores versus the FX75 for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus TG-870 vs Panasonic FX75 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75. The whole galleries are available at Olympus TG-870 Gallery & Panasonic FX75 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-870 over the Panasonic FX75
| TG-870 | FX75 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2016 |  | June 2010 | More recent by 69 months |
| Display type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting display |
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 921k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+691k dot) |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FX75 over the Olympus TG-870
| FX75 | TG-870 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus TG-870 and Panasonic FX75
| TG-870 | FX75 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Lack of manual focusing | ||
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen |
Olympus TG-870 vs Panasonic FX75 Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to lug around your camera frequently, you will need to factor its weight and proportions. The Olympus TG-870 has external measurements of 113mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs) whilst the Panasonic FX75 has measurements of 103mm x 55mm x 23mm (4.1" x 2.2" x 0.9") along with a weight of 165 grams (0.36 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus TG-870 vs Panasonic FX75 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are employing at the time. Underneath is the front view size comparison of the TG-870 against the FX75.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the TG-870 and FX75 is 91 and 94 respectively.
Olympus TG-870 vs Panasonic FX75 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is difficult to see the gap between sensor measurements purely by reviewing technical specs. The visual underneath might provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the TG-870 and FX75.
As you have seen, both the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but not the same MP. You can anticipate the Olympus TG-870 to deliver more detail with its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will allow you to crop images far more aggressively. The fresher TG-870 is going to have an advantage in sensor tech.
Olympus TG-870 vs Panasonic FX75 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Olympus TG-870 vs Panasonic FX75 Specifications
| Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Panasonic |
| Model | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75 |
| Also Known as | - | Lumix DMC-FX70 |
| Class | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2016-01-06 | 2010-06-01 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic VII | Venus Engine HD II |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Highest boosted ISO | 12800 | - |
| Minimum native ISO | 125 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 21-105mm (5.0x) | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.5-5.7 | f/2.2-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 3cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Resolution of display | 921 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 60 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 7.0 frames per second | 2.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.00 m (at ISO 1600) | 7.40 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, off, LED illuminator | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (60p) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | AVCHD Lite, Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 221g (0.49 pounds) | 165g (0.36 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 113 x 64 x 28mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.1") | 103 x 55 x 23mm (4.1" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 photos | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | Li-50B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at launch | $280 | $139 |