Olympus TG-870 vs Panasonic FZ200
91 Imaging
41 Features
46 Overall
43
65 Imaging
36 Features
64 Overall
47
Olympus TG-870 vs Panasonic FZ200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400 (Increase to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 221g - 113 x 64 x 28mm
- Launched January 2016
- Earlier Model is Olympus TG-860
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Bump to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-600mm (F2.8) lens
- 588g - 125 x 87 x 110mm
- Launched July 2012
- Replaced the Panasonic FZ100
- Later Model is Panasonic FZ300
Olympus TG-870 vs Panasonic FZ200 Overview
The following is a thorough overview of the Olympus TG-870 versus Panasonic FZ200, one is a Ultracompact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a sizeable gap among the sensor resolutions of the TG-870 (16MP) and FZ200 (12MP) but they feature the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe TG-870 was revealed 3 years after the FZ200 which is a fairly large gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus TG-870 being a Ultracompact camera and the Panasonic FZ200 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before diving straight into a thorough comparison, below is a concise highlight of how the TG-870 grades versus the FZ200 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus TG-870 vs Panasonic FZ200 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus TG-870 Gallery and Panasonic FZ200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-870 over the Panasonic FZ200
TG-870 | FZ200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2016 | July 2012 | Newer by 43 months | |
Screen resolution | 921k | 460k | Clearer screen (+461k dot) |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ200 over the Olympus TG-870
FZ200 | TG-870 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Very accurate focus | |||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Tilting | Fully Articulating screen | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies |
Common features in the Olympus TG-870 and Panasonic FZ200
TG-870 | FZ200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical screen size | |
Touch screen | Lacking Touch screen |
Olympus TG-870 vs Panasonic FZ200 Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to travel with your camera frequently, you'll have to factor its weight and dimensions. The Olympus TG-870 has exterior measurements of 113mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.1") and a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs) whilst the Panasonic FZ200 has dimensions of 125mm x 87mm x 110mm (4.9" x 3.4" x 4.3") having a weight of 588 grams (1.30 lbs).
See the Olympus TG-870 versus Panasonic FZ200 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you use at that time. The following is the front view measurements comparison of the TG-870 and the FZ200.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the TG-870 and FZ200 is 91 and 65 respectively.
Olympus TG-870 vs Panasonic FZ200 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, its tough to envision the gap in sensor dimensions merely by seeing technical specs. The picture below should provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the TG-870 and FZ200.
As you have seen, both the cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same megapixels. You should expect the Olympus TG-870 to provide greater detail because of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop pictures much more aggressively. The fresher TG-870 is going to have an advantage with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus TG-870 vs Panasonic FZ200 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus TG-870 vs Panasonic FZ200 Specifications
Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200 |
Type | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2016-01-06 | 2012-07-18 |
Physical type | Ultracompact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic VII | Venus Engine VII FHD |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Highest enhanced ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 125 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | - | 23 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 21-105mm (5.0x) | 25-600mm (24.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.5-5.7 | f/2.8 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Tilting | Fully Articulated |
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 921 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen tech | - | Free-Angle TFT Screen LCD Display |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 1,312 thousand dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 60 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 7.0 frames/s | 12.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.00 m (at ISO 1600) | 13.50 m |
Flash options | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, off, LED illuminator | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | - | 1/4000 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (60p) | 1920 x 1080 (60, 50, 30, 25 fps), 1280 x 720p (60, 50, 30, 25 fps), 640 x 480 (240, 120, 30, 25 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 221 grams (0.49 pounds) | 588 grams (1.30 pounds) |
Dimensions | 113 x 64 x 28mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.1") | 125 x 87 x 110mm (4.9" x 3.4" x 4.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 37 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 19.1 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 10.8 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 114 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 pictures | 540 pictures |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | Li-50B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at release | $280 | $499 |