Olympus TG-870 vs Panasonic ZS40
91 Imaging
41 Features
46 Overall
43
90 Imaging
43 Features
58 Overall
49
Olympus TG-870 vs Panasonic ZS40 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400 (Push to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 221g - 113 x 64 x 28mm
- Introduced January 2016
- Old Model is Olympus TG-860
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Boost to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-720mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
- 240g - 111 x 64 x 34mm
- Introduced January 2014
- Alternate Name is Lumix DMC-TZ60
- Succeeded the Panasonic ZS35
- Newer Model is Panasonic ZS45
Olympus TG-870 vs Panasonic ZS40 Overview
Lets examine more in depth at the Olympus TG-870 vs Panasonic ZS40, one being a Ultracompact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Olympus and Panasonic. The resolution of the TG-870 (16MP) and the ZS40 (18MP) is pretty close and they feature the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe TG-870 was introduced 2 years later than the ZS40 and that is a fairly significant gap as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras come with different body type with the Olympus TG-870 being a Ultracompact camera and the Panasonic ZS40 being a Compact camera.
Before going in to a detailed comparison, below is a concise introduction of how the TG-870 matches up vs the ZS40 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus TG-870 vs Panasonic ZS40 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS40. The whole galleries are available at Olympus TG-870 Gallery and Panasonic ZS40 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-870 over the Panasonic ZS40
TG-870 | ZS40 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2016 | January 2014 | More recent by 25 months | |
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen resolution | 921k | 920k | Clearer screen (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS40 over the Olympus TG-870
ZS40 | TG-870 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | More accurate focus |
Common features in the Olympus TG-870 and Panasonic ZS40
TG-870 | ZS40 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical screen measurements | |
Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Neither has Touch friendly screen |
Olympus TG-870 vs Panasonic ZS40 Physical Comparison
If you're looking to lug around your camera, you need to consider its weight and proportions. The Olympus TG-870 has outside measurements of 113mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.1") with a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs) and the Panasonic ZS40 has measurements of 111mm x 64mm x 34mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.3") with a weight of 240 grams (0.53 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus TG-870 vs Panasonic ZS40 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are using during that time. The following is the front view overall size comparison of the TG-870 compared to the ZS40.
Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the TG-870 and ZS40 is 91 and 90 respectively.
Olympus TG-870 vs Panasonic ZS40 Sensor Comparison
Often, it's difficult to envision the difference in sensor measurements merely by viewing a spec sheet. The visual here should provide you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the TG-870 and ZS40.
Clearly, both of these cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same MP. You should expect the Panasonic ZS40 to provide you with extra detail using its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop pictures much more aggressively. The more modern TG-870 will have an advantage in sensor tech.
Olympus TG-870 vs Panasonic ZS40 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus TG-870 vs Panasonic ZS40 Specifications
Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS40 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS40 |
Also called as | - | Lumix DMC-TZ60 |
Type | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2016-01-06 | 2014-01-06 |
Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic VII | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 18MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4896 x 3672 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 125 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | - | 23 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 21-105mm (5.0x) | 24-720mm (30.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.7 | f/3.3-6.4 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | 3cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 921k dots | 920k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT LCD with AR coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 200k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter rate | 7.0fps | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 4.00 m (at ISO 1600) | 6.40 m |
Flash modes | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, off, LED illuminator | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (60p) | 1920 x 1080 (60p/60i/30p), 1280 x 720 (60p/30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 221g (0.49 lbs) | 240g (0.53 lbs) |
Dimensions | 113 x 64 x 28mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.1") | 111 x 64 x 34mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 photographs | 300 photographs |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | Li-50B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Price at release | $280 | $450 |