Olympus TG-870 vs Pentax 645Z
91 Imaging
41 Features
46 Overall
43
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/98cb4/98cb42e909dff8452621d79a82a9f24270e5e01f" alt="Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 front Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d6ed/6d6edc8aab7ff26eee67ca112c237e6a12789c89" alt="Pentax 645Z front Pentax 645Z front"
49 Imaging
80 Features
74 Overall
77
Olympus TG-870 vs Pentax 645Z Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 125 - 6400 (Expand to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 221g - 113 x 64 x 28mm
- Released January 2016
- Older Model is Olympus TG-860
(Full Review)
- 51MP - Medium format Sensor
- 3.2" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 204800
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Pentax 645AF2 Mount
- 1550g - 156 x 117 x 123mm
- Announced April 2014
- Superseded the Pentax 645D
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus TG-870 vs Pentax 645Z Overview
Here is a in-depth overview of the Olympus TG-870 vs Pentax 645Z, one being a Ultracompact and the latter is a Pro DSLR by rivals Olympus and Pentax. There is a sizeable difference between the image resolutions of the TG-870 (16MP) and 645Z (51MP) and the TG-870 (1/2.3") and 645Z (Medium format) offer totally different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
The TG-870 was launched 22 months later than the 645Z which makes them a generation apart from each other. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus TG-870 being a Ultracompact camera and the Pentax 645Z being a Large SLR camera.
Before going into a in-depth comparison, here is a quick synopsis of how the TG-870 grades vs the 645Z in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus TG-870 vs Pentax 645Z Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 and Pentax 645Z. The complete galleries are available at Olympus TG-870 Gallery and Pentax 645Z Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-870 over the Pentax 645Z
TG-870 | 645Z | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | January 2016 | ![]() | April 2014 | Fresher by 22 months |
Reasons to pick Pentax 645Z over the Olympus TG-870
645Z | TG-870 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | More precise focusing | ||
Screen dimensions | 3.2" | ![]() | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.2") |
Screen resolution | 1037k | ![]() | 921k | Crisper screen (+116k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus TG-870 and Pentax 645Z
TG-870 | 645Z | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Tilting | Tilting screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Absent Touch friendly screen |
Olympus TG-870 vs Pentax 645Z Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to carry your camera, you will have to factor in its weight and volume. The Olympus TG-870 has got outer measurements of 113mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.1") with a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs) and the Pentax 645Z has sizing of 156mm x 117mm x 123mm (6.1" x 4.6" x 4.8") and a weight of 1550 grams (3.42 lbs).
Look at the Olympus TG-870 vs Pentax 645Z in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you have at the time. Below is a front view size comparison of the TG-870 against the 645Z.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8fbd1/8fbd1eea62c9a6665e557f61d8660d2866f413df" alt="Olympus TG-870 vs Pentax 645Z size comparison Olympus TG-870 vs Pentax 645Z size comparison"
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the TG-870 and 645Z is 91 and 49 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8e100/8e100a0161d7a993dfeba6eb9aefccb02d945ffc" alt="Olympus TG-870 vs Pentax 645Z top view buttons comparison Olympus TG-870 vs Pentax 645Z top view buttons comparison"
Olympus TG-870 vs Pentax 645Z Sensor Comparison
Generally, its hard to envision the contrast between sensor sizing simply by going over a spec sheet. The photograph below should offer you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the TG-870 and 645Z.
As you can see, both of these cameras have different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The TG-870 featuring a tinier sensor will make shooting bokeh trickier and the Pentax 645Z will deliver greater detail utilizing its extra 35 Megapixels. Higher resolution will enable you to crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The more modern TG-870 is going to have an advantage with regard to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b0c94/b0c94f807a8988bcf31dec8c1188f864a335fe06" alt="Olympus TG-870 vs Pentax 645Z sensor size comparison Olympus TG-870 vs Pentax 645Z sensor size comparison"
Olympus TG-870 vs Pentax 645Z Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/510b2/510b2bf67fb8c782aa1404374af20501d5bc471a" alt="Olympus TG-870 vs Pentax 645Z Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus TG-870 vs Pentax 645Z Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus TG-870 vs Pentax 645Z Specifications
Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 | Pentax 645Z | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Pentax |
Model type | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 | Pentax 645Z |
Type | Ultracompact | Pro DSLR |
Released | 2016-01-06 | 2014-04-15 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Large SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic VII | PRIME III |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Medium format |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 44 x 33mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 1,452.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 51MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 8256 x 6192 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 204800 |
Max enhanced ISO | 12800 | - |
Min native ISO | 125 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Total focus points | - | 27 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | Pentax 645AF2 |
Lens zoom range | 21-105mm (5.0x) | - |
Maximum aperture | f/3.5-5.7 | - |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
Available lenses | - | 6 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 0.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Tilting | Tilting |
Display sizing | 3" | 3.2" |
Display resolution | 921 thousand dot | 1,037 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 98% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.85x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 7.0 frames per second | 3.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.00 m (at ISO 1600) | no built-in flash |
Flash options | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, off, LED illuminator | Flash On, Flash On+Red-eye Reduction, Slow-speed Sync, Slow-speed Sync+Red-eye, P-TTL, Trailing Curtain Sync, contrast-control-sync, high-speed sync, wireless sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | - | 1/125 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (60p) | 1920 x 1080 (60i, 50i, 30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p,24p) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 221g (0.49 lb) | 1550g (3.42 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 113 x 64 x 28mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.1") | 156 x 117 x 123mm (6.1" x 4.6" x 4.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 101 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 26.0 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 14.7 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 4505 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 pictures | 650 pictures |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | Li-50B | D-LI90 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots |
Storage slots | Single | Two |
Pricing at release | $280 | $5,024 |