Olympus TG-870 vs Pentax K-50
91 Imaging
41 Features
46 Overall
43
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/98cb4/98cb42e909dff8452621d79a82a9f24270e5e01f" alt="Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 front Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/006ea/006eadf258c1845fa0cf529af15aba3f0081fb3d" alt="Pentax K-50 front Pentax K-50 front"
63 Imaging
58 Features
65 Overall
60
Olympus TG-870 vs Pentax K-50 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400 (Expand to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 221g - 113 x 64 x 28mm
- Announced January 2016
- Succeeded the Olympus TG-860
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 51600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/6000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Pentax KAF2 Mount
- 650g - 130 x 97 x 71mm
- Revealed November 2013
- Succeeded the Pentax K-30
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus TG-870 vs Pentax K-50 Overview
Let's look much closer at the Olympus TG-870 vs Pentax K-50, one is a Ultracompact and the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by companies Olympus and Pentax. The sensor resolution of the TG-870 (16MP) and the K-50 (16MP) is relatively similar but the TG-870 (1/2.3") and K-50 (APS-C) offer totally different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
The TG-870 was announced 2 years after the K-50 which is quite a significant gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus TG-870 being a Ultracompact camera and the Pentax K-50 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before delving straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a short overview of how the TG-870 scores vs the K-50 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus TG-870 vs Pentax K-50 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 and Pentax K-50. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus TG-870 Gallery and Pentax K-50 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-870 over the Pentax K-50
TG-870 | K-50 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | January 2016 | ![]() | November 2013 | Newer by 26 months |
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Reasons to pick Pentax K-50 over the Olympus TG-870
K-50 | TG-870 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial precise focus |
Common features in the Olympus TG-870 and Pentax K-50
TG-870 | K-50 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same screen dimensions |
Screen resolution | 921k | ![]() | 921k | Exact same screen resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Neither features Touch friendly screen |
Olympus TG-870 vs Pentax K-50 Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to travel with your camera regularly, you'll need to factor its weight and size. The Olympus TG-870 enjoys outer dimensions of 113mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.1") having a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs) and the Pentax K-50 has specifications of 130mm x 97mm x 71mm (5.1" x 3.8" x 2.8") and a weight of 650 grams (1.43 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus TG-870 vs Pentax K-50 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you have chosen at the time. Here is a front view dimensions comparison of the TG-870 against the K-50.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/002e8/002e83333b34fb77e055228f8df0b698ad37fb65" alt="Olympus TG-870 vs Pentax K-50 size comparison Olympus TG-870 vs Pentax K-50 size comparison"
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the TG-870 and K-50 is 91 and 63 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c213e/c213ee5c4750e5f19ee861cb07ecd4be1d4c7968" alt="Olympus TG-870 vs Pentax K-50 top view buttons comparison Olympus TG-870 vs Pentax K-50 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus TG-870 vs Pentax K-50 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it's difficult to see the gap between sensor dimensions merely by reviewing a spec sheet. The picture here might offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the TG-870 and K-50.
Clearly, both of those cameras come with the identical megapixel count albeit not the same sensor dimensions. The TG-870 has got the tinier sensor which should make achieving shallow DOF harder. The fresher TG-870 is going to have an edge in sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fa7b7/fa7b7f1d27c471b4c4305fd7ddada151fe863340" alt="Olympus TG-870 vs Pentax K-50 sensor size comparison Olympus TG-870 vs Pentax K-50 sensor size comparison"
Olympus TG-870 vs Pentax K-50 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3e4f7/3e4f7062cdf5fd696144268740487fdbca878288" alt="Olympus TG-870 vs Pentax K-50 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus TG-870 vs Pentax K-50 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus TG-870 vs Pentax K-50 Specifications
Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 | Pentax K-50 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Pentax |
Model type | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 | Pentax K-50 |
Type | Ultracompact | Entry-Level DSLR |
Announced | 2016-01-06 | 2013-11-27 |
Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic VII | PRIME M |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.7 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 372.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4928 x 3264 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 51600 |
Highest enhanced ISO | 12800 | - |
Min native ISO | 125 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | - | 11 |
Cross type focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | Pentax KAF2 |
Lens zoom range | 21-105mm (5.0x) | - |
Highest aperture | f/3.5-5.7 | - |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
Amount of lenses | - | 151 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 921 thousand dots | 921 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT LCD monitor with brightness/color adjustment and AR coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.61x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/6000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 7.0fps | 6.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.00 m (at ISO 1600) | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash settings | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, off, LED illuminator | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync, Slow Sync+Redeye, Trailing Curtain Sync, Wireless |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | - | 1/180 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (60p) | 1920 x 1080 (30,25,24 fps), 1280 x 720 (60,50,30,25,24 fps), 640 x 424 (30,25,24 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 221 gr (0.49 pounds) | 650 gr (1.43 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 113 x 64 x 28mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.1") | 130 x 97 x 71mm (5.1" x 3.8" x 2.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 79 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 23.7 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 13.0 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 1120 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 photos | 410 photos |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | Li-50B | D-LI109 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) | Yes ( 2 or 12 seconds) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch cost | $280 | $610 |