Olympus TG-870 vs Pentax K10D
91 Imaging
41 Features
46 Overall
43
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/98cb4/98cb42e909dff8452621d79a82a9f24270e5e01f" alt="Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 front Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/77d15/77d15cdea107865b9392e65f3301ad6c2f2bfcfd" alt="Pentax K10D front Pentax K10D front"
59 Imaging
48 Features
43 Overall
46
Olympus TG-870 vs Pentax K10D Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 125 - 6400 (Expand to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 221g - 113 x 64 x 28mm
- Announced January 2016
- Older Model is Olympus TG-860
(Full Review)
- 10MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Pentax KAF2 Mount
- 793g - 142 x 101 x 70mm
- Revealed December 2006
- Replacement is Pentax K20D
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus TG-870 vs Pentax K10D Overview
Here, we will be evaluating the Olympus TG-870 vs Pentax K10D, one is a Ultracompact and the latter is a Advanced DSLR by manufacturers Olympus and Pentax. There is a significant difference among the sensor resolutions of the TG-870 (16MP) and K10D (10MP) and the TG-870 (1/2.3") and K10D (APS-C) have totally different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
The TG-870 was announced 9 years after the K10D which is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus TG-870 being a Ultracompact camera and the Pentax K10D being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before going into a step-by-step comparison, here is a concise summary of how the TG-870 matches up against the K10D when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus TG-870 vs Pentax K10D Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 and Pentax K10D. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus TG-870 Gallery and Pentax K10D Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-870 over the Pentax K10D
TG-870 | K10D | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | January 2016 | ![]() | December 2006 | More modern by 111 months |
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
Screen resolution | 921k | ![]() | 210k | Sharper screen (+711k dot) |
Reasons to pick Pentax K10D over the Olympus TG-870
K10D | TG-870 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Very exact focus |
Common features in the Olympus TG-870 and Pentax K10D
TG-870 | K10D | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | No Touch friendly screen |
Olympus TG-870 vs Pentax K10D Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to carry around your camera often, you will want to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Olympus TG-870 provides outside dimensions of 113mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.1") and a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs) whilst the Pentax K10D has dimensions of 142mm x 101mm x 70mm (5.6" x 4.0" x 2.8") and a weight of 793 grams (1.75 lbs).
Look at the Olympus TG-870 vs Pentax K10D in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are working with at that moment. Here is a front view physical size comparison of the TG-870 vs the K10D.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/30a67/30a678ea785c879e5bc8736a8fadf7fc68e7dca6" alt="Olympus TG-870 vs Pentax K10D size comparison Olympus TG-870 vs Pentax K10D size comparison"
Using size and weight, the portability rating of the TG-870 and K10D is 91 and 59 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6746f/6746f09b1a9241d3edf159b5e38821caceae70c6" alt="Olympus TG-870 vs Pentax K10D top view buttons comparison Olympus TG-870 vs Pentax K10D top view buttons comparison"
Olympus TG-870 vs Pentax K10D Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is very difficult to envision the contrast in sensor sizes merely by checking out a spec sheet. The image here should offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the TG-870 and K10D.
As you can see, each of these cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The TG-870 using its smaller sensor will make achieving bokeh more difficult and the Olympus TG-870 will produce extra detail with its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will also let you crop shots a good deal more aggressively. The more recent TG-870 is going to have an advantage when it comes to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/88124/88124e09b456d25c756c06fcefc8df233c985eab" alt="Olympus TG-870 vs Pentax K10D sensor size comparison Olympus TG-870 vs Pentax K10D sensor size comparison"
Olympus TG-870 vs Pentax K10D Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f8a52/f8a52645b1c4220fd114d1dceef25af3585e3bab" alt="Olympus TG-870 vs Pentax K10D Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus TG-870 vs Pentax K10D Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus TG-870 vs Pentax K10D Specifications
Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 | Pentax K10D | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Pentax |
Model type | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 | Pentax K10D |
Category | Ultracompact | Advanced DSLR |
Announced | 2016-01-06 | 2006-12-15 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic VII | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3872 x 2592 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
Highest boosted ISO | 12800 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 125 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | - | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | Pentax KAF2 |
Lens zoom range | 21-105mm (5.0x) | - |
Max aperture | f/3.5-5.7 | - |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
Number of lenses | - | 151 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3" | 2.5" |
Display resolution | 921k dot | 210k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 95 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.64x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 7.0 frames per second | 3.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.00 m (at ISO 1600) | - |
Flash modes | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, off, LED illuminator | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Auto Red Eye |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | - | 1/180 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (60p) | - |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 221g (0.49 lb) | 793g (1.75 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 113 x 64 x 28mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.1") | 142 x 101 x 70mm (5.6" x 4.0" x 2.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 66 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.7 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 11.6 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 522 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 images | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | Li-50B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD/MMC/SDHC card |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Retail price | $280 | $700 |