Olympus TG-870 vs Pentax E90
91 Imaging
41 Features
46 Overall
43
94 Imaging
33 Features
11 Overall
24
Olympus TG-870 vs Pentax E90 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400 (Increase to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 221g - 113 x 64 x 28mm
- Released January 2016
- Replaced the Olympus TG-860
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 32-95mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 145g - 102 x 59 x 25mm
- Introduced January 2010
Olympus TG-870 vs Pentax E90 Overview
The following is a thorough analysis of the Olympus TG-870 versus Pentax E90, former is a Ultracompact while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Olympus and Pentax. There is a large difference among the sensor resolutions of the TG-870 (16MP) and E90 (10MP) but both cameras offer the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe TG-870 was unveiled 6 years after the E90 which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus TG-870 being a Ultracompact camera and the Pentax E90 being a Compact camera.
Before getting into a step-by-step comparison, here is a short highlight of how the TG-870 grades against the E90 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus TG-870 vs Pentax E90 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 & Pentax Optio E90. The full galleries are provided at Olympus TG-870 Gallery & Pentax E90 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-870 over the Pentax E90
TG-870 | E90 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2016 | January 2010 | Newer by 73 months | |
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display size | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 921k | 230k | Sharper display (+691k dot) |
Reasons to pick Pentax E90 over the Olympus TG-870
E90 | TG-870 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus TG-870 and Pentax E90
TG-870 | E90 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Lack of manual focus | |||
Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Neither includes Touch friendly display |
Olympus TG-870 vs Pentax E90 Physical Comparison
When you are planning to travel with your camera, you will want to factor its weight and measurements. The Olympus TG-870 features external dimensions of 113mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.1") along with a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs) whilst the Pentax E90 has proportions of 102mm x 59mm x 25mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.0") having a weight of 145 grams (0.32 lbs).
See the Olympus TG-870 versus Pentax E90 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are utilizing at the time. Below is a front view dimension comparison of the TG-870 and the E90.
Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the TG-870 and E90 is 91 and 94 respectively.
Olympus TG-870 vs Pentax E90 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it's tough to envision the difference in sensor dimensions just by checking out a spec sheet. The image here might provide you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the TG-870 and E90.
As you can see, both the cameras feature the identical sensor size but not the same MP. You can anticipate the Olympus TG-870 to show greater detail having an extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will allow you to crop images way more aggressively. The more recent TG-870 is going to have an advantage with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus TG-870 vs Pentax E90 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus TG-870 vs Pentax E90 Specifications
Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 | Pentax Optio E90 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Pentax |
Model type | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 | Pentax Optio E90 |
Type | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Compact |
Released | 2016-01-06 | 2010-01-25 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic VII | Prime |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 10MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Highest boosted ISO | 12800 | - |
Minimum native ISO | 125 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | - | 3 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 21-105mm (5.0x) | 32-95mm (3.0x) |
Max aperture | f/3.5-5.7 | f/3.1-5.9 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | 6cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
Resolution of screen | 921 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 7.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.00 m (at ISO 1600) | 3.50 m |
Flash modes | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, off, LED illuminator | - |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (60p) | 1280 x 720 (15 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 221 gr (0.49 pounds) | 145 gr (0.32 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 113 x 64 x 28mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.1") | 102 x 59 x 25mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 pictures | - |
Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | Li-50B | 2 x AA |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at launch | $280 | $100 |