Olympus TG-870 vs Pentax WG-2
91 Imaging
41 Features
46 Overall
43
91 Imaging
39 Features
37 Overall
38
Olympus TG-870 vs Pentax WG-2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400 (Increase to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 221g - 113 x 64 x 28mm
- Introduced January 2016
- Succeeded the Olympus TG-860
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 192g - 122 x 61 x 30mm
- Released February 2012
Olympus TG-870 vs Pentax WG-2 Overview
Lets examine more in depth at the Olympus TG-870 and Pentax WG-2, former being a Ultracompact while the other is a Waterproof by rivals Olympus and Pentax. The sensor resolution of the TG-870 (16MP) and the WG-2 (16MP) is very comparable and they feature the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe TG-870 was launched 3 years later than the WG-2 and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus TG-870 being a Ultracompact camera and the Pentax WG-2 being a Compact camera.
Before going through a complete comparison, below is a short summation of how the TG-870 scores versus the WG-2 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus TG-870 vs Pentax WG-2 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 & Pentax Optio WG-2. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus TG-870 Gallery & Pentax WG-2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-870 over the Pentax WG-2
TG-870 | WG-2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2016 | February 2012 | Fresher by 48 months | |
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display resolution | 921k | 460k | Clearer display (+461k dot) |
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-2 over the Olympus TG-870
WG-2 | TG-870 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Dial accurate focusing |
Common features in the Olympus TG-870 and Pentax WG-2
TG-870 | WG-2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent display measurement | |
Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Missing Touch friendly display |
Olympus TG-870 vs Pentax WG-2 Physical Comparison
If you're going to carry your camera regularly, you'll need to think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus TG-870 has outside measurements of 113mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.1") having a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs) whilst the Pentax WG-2 has dimensions of 122mm x 61mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") with a weight of 192 grams (0.42 lbs).
Compare the Olympus TG-870 and Pentax WG-2 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you have attached at that moment. Here is the front view physical size comparison of the TG-870 versus the WG-2.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the TG-870 and WG-2 is 91 and 91 respectively.
Olympus TG-870 vs Pentax WG-2 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is tough to visualize the difference in sensor sizing merely by going through a spec sheet. The photograph underneath will give you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the TG-870 and WG-2.
As you can see, both cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing and the same MP and you can expect comparable quality of files though you will need to consider the age of the cameras into account. The younger TG-870 provides an edge in sensor tech.
Olympus TG-870 vs Pentax WG-2 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus TG-870 vs Pentax WG-2 Specifications
Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 | Pentax Optio WG-2 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Pentax |
Model type | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 | Pentax Optio WG-2 |
Class | Ultracompact | Waterproof |
Introduced | 2016-01-06 | 2012-02-07 |
Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic VII | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Highest boosted ISO | 12800 | - |
Min native ISO | 125 | 125 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 21-105mm (5.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.7 | f/3.5-5.5 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 921k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen technology | - | Widescreen TFT color LCD with anti-reflective coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 7.0fps | 1.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.00 m (at ISO 1600) | 5.40 m |
Flash modes | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, off, LED illuminator | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (60p) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 221 grams (0.49 lbs) | 192 grams (0.42 lbs) |
Dimensions | 113 x 64 x 28mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.1") | 122 x 61 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 photos | 260 photos |
Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | Li-50B | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch price | $280 | $350 |