Olympus TG-870 vs Ricoh CX4
91 Imaging
41 Features
46 Overall
43


92 Imaging
33 Features
34 Overall
33
Olympus TG-870 vs Ricoh CX4 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 125 - 6400 (Expand to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 221g - 113 x 64 x 28mm
- Launched January 2016
- Succeeded the Olympus TG-860
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 205g - 102 x 59 x 29mm
- Released August 2010

Olympus TG-870 vs Ricoh CX4 Overview
The following is a complete comparison of the Olympus TG-870 versus Ricoh CX4, former is a Ultracompact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Olympus and Ricoh. There is a considerable difference among the resolutions of the TG-870 (16MP) and CX4 (10MP) but both cameras provide the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").

The TG-870 was unveiled 5 years after the CX4 which is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus TG-870 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh CX4 being a Compact camera.
Before going straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a brief overview of how the TG-870 grades vs the CX4 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Olympus TG-870 vs Ricoh CX4 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 & Ricoh CX4. The full galleries are available at Olympus TG-870 Gallery & Ricoh CX4 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-870 over the Ricoh CX4
TG-870 | CX4 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2016 | ![]() | August 2010 | Newer by 66 months |
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display resolution | 921k | ![]() | 920k | Sharper display (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX4 over the Olympus TG-870
CX4 | TG-870 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial precise focus |
Common features in the Olympus TG-870 and Ricoh CX4
TG-870 | CX4 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same display sizing |
Selfie screen | ![]() | No selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | No Touch display |
Olympus TG-870 vs Ricoh CX4 Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to travel with your camera regularly, you're going to have to consider its weight and dimensions. The Olympus TG-870 comes with external dimensions of 113mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.1") having a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs) whilst the Ricoh CX4 has dimensions of 102mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus TG-870 versus Ricoh CX4 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you use at that moment. The following is a front view over all size comparison of the TG-870 and the CX4.

Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the TG-870 and CX4 is 91 and 92 respectively.

Olympus TG-870 vs Ricoh CX4 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it can be tough to visualize the gap in sensor dimensions purely by checking out technical specs. The image underneath will help offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the TG-870 and CX4.
As you have seen, each of the cameras come with the identical sensor size but different resolution. You can expect to see the Olympus TG-870 to produce more detail having an extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also let you crop images a good deal more aggressively. The more recent TG-870 should have an edge with regard to sensor technology.

Olympus TG-870 vs Ricoh CX4 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus TG-870 vs Ricoh CX4 Specifications
Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 | Ricoh CX4 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model type | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 | Ricoh CX4 |
Type | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2016-01-06 | 2010-08-19 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic VII | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Maximum boosted ISO | 12800 | - |
Min native ISO | 125 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 21-105mm (5.0x) | 28-300mm (10.7x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.7 | f/3.5-5.6 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 921 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 8 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 7.0fps | 5.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.00 m (at ISO 1600) | 4.00 m |
Flash options | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, off, LED illuminator | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (60p) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 221 grams (0.49 lb) | 205 grams (0.45 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 113 x 64 x 28mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.1") | 102 x 59 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 shots | - |
Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | Li-50B | DB-100 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Cost at launch | $280 | $211 |