Olympus TG-870 vs Ricoh CX5
91 Imaging
41 Features
46 Overall
43
92 Imaging
34 Features
35 Overall
34
Olympus TG-870 vs Ricoh CX5 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 125 - 6400 (Push to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 221g - 113 x 64 x 28mm
- Announced January 2016
- Previous Model is Olympus TG-860
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 205g - 102 x 59 x 29mm
- Released July 2011
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus TG-870 vs Ricoh CX5 Overview
Below is a detailed comparison of the Olympus TG-870 and Ricoh CX5, one being a Ultracompact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Olympus and Ricoh. There exists a sizeable gap among the image resolutions of the TG-870 (16MP) and CX5 (10MP) but they come with the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe TG-870 was released 4 years later than the CX5 and that is a fairly large gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus TG-870 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh CX5 being a Compact camera.
Before we go in to a more detailed comparison, below is a brief synopsis of how the TG-870 scores against the CX5 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus TG-870 vs Ricoh CX5 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 and Ricoh CX5. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus TG-870 Gallery and Ricoh CX5 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-870 over the Ricoh CX5
| TG-870 | CX5 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2016 |  | July 2011 | More recent by 55 months |
| Display type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting display |
| Display resolution | 921k |  | 920k | Sharper display (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX5 over the Olympus TG-870
| CX5 | TG-870 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | More precise focusing |
Common features in the Olympus TG-870 and Ricoh CX5
| TG-870 | CX5 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent display measurements |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | No Touch friendly display |
Olympus TG-870 vs Ricoh CX5 Physical Comparison
If you're intending to lug around your camera regularly, you are going to need to consider its weight and volume. The Olympus TG-870 comes with exterior dimensions of 113mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.1") with a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs) and the Ricoh CX5 has sizing of 102mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs).
Check out the Olympus TG-870 and Ricoh CX5 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you have at the time. Underneath is the front view dimension comparison of the TG-870 against the CX5.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the TG-870 and CX5 is 91 and 92 respectively.
Olympus TG-870 vs Ricoh CX5 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is tough to picture the contrast in sensor measurements just by seeing specs. The photograph below might give you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the TG-870 and CX5.
As you can plainly see, each of the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but different megapixels. You should expect to see the Olympus TG-870 to show more detail as a result of its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will enable you to crop photos far more aggressively. The more recent TG-870 provides an advantage when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus TG-870 vs Ricoh CX5 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixelsLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Olympus TG-870 vs Ricoh CX5 Specifications
| Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 | Ricoh CX5 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 | Ricoh CX5 |
| Class | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2016-01-06 | 2011-07-19 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | TruePic VII | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Max boosted ISO | 12800 | - |
| Lowest native ISO | 125 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 21-105mm (5.0x) | 28-300mm (10.7x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.5-5.7 | f/3.5-5.6 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Display resolution | 921k dots | 920k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 8 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 7.0 frames/s | 5.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.00 m (at ISO 1600) | 4.00 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, off, LED illuminator | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (60p) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 221 grams (0.49 lbs) | 205 grams (0.45 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 113 x 64 x 28mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.1") | 102 x 59 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 photographs | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | Li-50B | DB-100 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Retail cost | $280 | $399 |
