Olympus TG-870 vs Ricoh G900
91 Imaging
41 Features
46 Overall
43
89 Imaging
47 Features
46 Overall
46
Olympus TG-870 vs Ricoh G900 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400 (Expand to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 221g - 113 x 64 x 28mm
- Announced January 2016
- Earlier Model is Olympus TG-860
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 247g - 118 x 66 x 33mm
- Introduced February 2018
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus TG-870 vs Ricoh G900 Overview
Below is a extended overview of the Olympus TG-870 versus Ricoh G900, former being a Ultracompact while the other is a Waterproof by companies Olympus and Ricoh. The sensor resolution of the TG-870 (16MP) and the G900 (20MP) is fairly similar and both cameras posses the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe TG-870 was announced 3 years before the G900 and that is quite a big difference as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras have different body design with the Olympus TG-870 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh G900 being a Compact camera.
Before getting into a thorough comparison, here is a concise summation of how the TG-870 grades versus the G900 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus TG-870 vs Ricoh G900 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 & Ricoh G900. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus TG-870 Gallery & Ricoh G900 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-870 over the Ricoh G900
| TG-870 | G900 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting display |
Reasons to pick Ricoh G900 over the Olympus TG-870
| G900 | TG-870 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2018 |  | January 2016 | More recent by 25 months |
| Focus manually |  | Very accurate focus | ||
| Display resolution | 1040k |  | 921k | Sharper display (+119k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus TG-870 and Ricoh G900
| TG-870 | G900 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal display measurements |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither provides Touch display |
Olympus TG-870 vs Ricoh G900 Physical Comparison
When you are intending to lug around your camera regularly, you have to take into account its weight and measurements. The Olympus TG-870 provides external measurements of 113mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.1") and a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs) and the Ricoh G900 has proportions of 118mm x 66mm x 33mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.3") with a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus TG-870 versus Ricoh G900 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you select at that moment. Underneath is a front view sizing comparison of the TG-870 against the G900.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the TG-870 and G900 is 91 and 89 respectively.
Olympus TG-870 vs Ricoh G900 Sensor Comparison
Generally, its difficult to see the difference between sensor measurements merely by going over technical specs. The graphic underneath will help provide you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the TG-870 and G900.
As you can tell, the 2 cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but not the same MP. You can anticipate the Ricoh G900 to offer more detail with its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop images more aggressively. The older TG-870 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus TG-870 vs Ricoh G900 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Olympus TG-870 vs Ricoh G900 Specifications
| Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 | Ricoh G900 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model type | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 | Ricoh G900 |
| Class | Ultracompact | Waterproof |
| Announced | 2016-01-06 | 2018-02-21 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic VII | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5184 x 3888 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Maximum boosted ISO | 12800 | - |
| Min native ISO | 125 | 125 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 21-105mm (5.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.5-5.7 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 921 thousand dots | 1,040 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 7.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.00 m (at ISO 1600) | 5.50 m (with Auto ISO) |
| Flash options | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, off, LED illuminator | Flash on, flash off |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (60p) | 3840x2160 |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Supports FlashAir SD cards |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | DB-110 lithium-ion battery & USB charger |
| GPS | BuiltIn | Built-in |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 221g (0.49 lb) | 247g (0.54 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 113 x 64 x 28mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.1") | 118 x 66 x 33mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 pictures | 340 pictures |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | Li-50B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) | Yes |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at launch | $280 | $752 |