Olympus TG-870 vs Ricoh GR
91 Imaging
41 Features
46 Overall
43
90 Imaging
57 Features
54 Overall
55
Olympus TG-870 vs Ricoh GR Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400 (Bump to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 221g - 113 x 64 x 28mm
- Announced January 2016
- Previous Model is Olympus TG-860
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28mm (F2.8) lens
- 245g - 117 x 61 x 35mm
- Launched April 2013
- Refreshed by Ricoh GR II
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus TG-870 vs Ricoh GR Overview
The following is a extended analysis of the Olympus TG-870 vs Ricoh GR, one is a Ultracompact and the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by rivals Olympus and Ricoh. The image resolution of the TG-870 (16MP) and the GR (16MP) is pretty close but the TG-870 (1/2.3") and GR (APS-C) feature totally different sensor dimensions.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe TG-870 was launched 2 years after the GR which is a fairly large gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus TG-870 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh GR being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before we go in to a thorough comparison, below is a simple synopsis of how the TG-870 grades versus the GR in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus TG-870 vs Ricoh GR Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 and Ricoh GR. The complete galleries are available at Olympus TG-870 Gallery and Ricoh GR Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-870 over the Ricoh GR
| TG-870 | GR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2016 | April 2013 | Newer by 34 months | |
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR over the Olympus TG-870
| GR | TG-870 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | Very accurate focusing | |||
| Screen resolution | 1230k | 921k | Crisper screen (+309k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus TG-870 and Ricoh GR
| TG-870 | GR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent screen sizing | |
| Selfie screen | No selfie screen | |||
| Touch screen | Neither features Touch screen |
Olympus TG-870 vs Ricoh GR Physical Comparison
If you are intending to travel with your camera regularly, you need to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Olympus TG-870 enjoys outer dimensions of 113mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.1") and a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs) and the Ricoh GR has dimensions of 117mm x 61mm x 35mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.4") and a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).
Check out the Olympus TG-870 vs Ricoh GR in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you use during that time. Below is the front view physical size comparison of the TG-870 against the GR.

Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the TG-870 and GR is 91 and 90 respectively.
Olympus TG-870 vs Ricoh GR Sensor Comparison
Generally, its hard to visualise the gap in sensor dimensions just by viewing specifications. The picture underneath may provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the TG-870 and GR.
Plainly, each of these cameras enjoy the same exact MP albeit not the same sensor dimensions. The TG-870 has got the smaller sensor which should make achieving shallower DOF more challenging. The fresher TG-870 will have an edge with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus TG-870 vs Ricoh GR Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Olympus TG-870 vs Ricoh GR Specifications
| Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 | Ricoh GR | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 | Ricoh GR |
| Category | Ultracompact | Large Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2016-01-06 | 2013-04-17 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Large Sensor Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic VII | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.7 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 372.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4928 x 3264 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 25600 |
| Max enhanced ISO | 12800 | - |
| Minimum native ISO | 125 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 21-105mm (5.0x) | 28mm (1x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.5-5.7 | f/2.8 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 921k dot | 1,230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen tech | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Optical (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 300 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 7.0 frames per second | 4.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.00 m (at ISO 1600) | 5.40 m (at ISO 100) |
| Flash options | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, off, LED illuminator | - |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Fastest flash sync | - | 1/4000 secs |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (60p) | 1920 x 1080 (30, 25, 24 fps), 1280 x 720 ( 60, 50, 30, 25, 24 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 25, 24 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 221 grams (0.49 pounds) | 245 grams (0.54 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 113 x 64 x 28mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.1") | 117 x 61 x 35mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.4") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | 78 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 23.6 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 13.5 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 972 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 images | 290 images |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | Li-50B | DB65 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD, SDHC, SDXC |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Price at release | $280 | $971 |