Olympus TG-870 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV
91 Imaging
41 Features
46 Overall
43
92 Imaging
35 Features
47 Overall
39
Olympus TG-870 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 125 - 6400 (Expand to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 221g - 113 x 64 x 28mm
- Introduced January 2016
- Earlier Model is Olympus TG-860
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28mm (F1.9) lens
- 190g - 109 x 59 x 33mm
- Introduced September 2011
- Previous Model is Ricoh GR Digital III
Olympus TG-870 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Overview
Let's look a little more in depth at the Olympus TG-870 versus Ricoh GR Digital IV, former is a Ultracompact while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Olympus and Ricoh. There is a noticeable difference among the resolutions of the TG-870 (16MP) and GR Digital IV (10MP) and the TG-870 (1/2.3") and GR Digital IV (1/1.7") offer different sensor size.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe TG-870 was manufactured 4 years after the GR Digital IV which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus TG-870 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh GR Digital IV being a Compact camera.
Before getting right into a in depth comparison, here is a short summary of how the TG-870 grades versus the GR Digital IV in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus TG-870 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 & Ricoh GR Digital IV. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus TG-870 Gallery & Ricoh GR Digital IV Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-870 over the Ricoh GR Digital IV
TG-870 | GR Digital IV | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2016 | September 2011 | Newer by 53 months | |
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital IV over the Olympus TG-870
GR Digital IV | TG-870 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Very precise focusing | |||
Display resolution | 1230k | 921k | Crisper display (+309k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus TG-870 and Ricoh GR Digital IV
TG-870 | GR Digital IV | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal display size | |
Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Missing Touch display |
Olympus TG-870 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to travel with your camera, you will want to take into account its weight and proportions. The Olympus TG-870 offers outside dimensions of 113mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.1") having a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs) whilst the Ricoh GR Digital IV has measurements of 109mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") along with a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus TG-870 versus Ricoh GR Digital IV in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you choose at that time. Following is a front view over all size comparison of the TG-870 versus the GR Digital IV.
Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the TG-870 and GR Digital IV is 91 and 92 respectively.
Olympus TG-870 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Sensor Comparison
Often, it can be hard to imagine the contrast in sensor dimensions only by checking out specifications. The image below will offer you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the TG-870 and GR Digital IV.
Plainly, each of the cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The TG-870 due to its smaller sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF harder and the Olympus TG-870 will provide greater detail due to its extra 6MP. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop pics more aggressively. The more modern TG-870 provides an advantage in sensor technology.
Olympus TG-870 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus TG-870 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Specifications
Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 | Ricoh GR Digital IV | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model type | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 | Ricoh GR Digital IV |
Category | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2016-01-06 | 2011-09-15 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic VII | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Highest enhanced ISO | 12800 | - |
Minimum native ISO | 125 | 80 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 21-105mm (5.0x) | 28mm (1x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.7 | f/1.9 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 921 thousand dot | 1,230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Optical (optional) |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 1 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 7.0 frames per second | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.00 m (at ISO 1600) | 3.00 m |
Flash settings | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, off, LED illuminator | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (60p) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 221 gr (0.49 lbs) | 190 gr (0.42 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 113 x 64 x 28mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.1") | 109 x 59 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 photographs | 390 photographs |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | Li-50B | DB65 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Cost at release | $280 | $599 |