Sony A390 vs Sony NEX-F3
66 Imaging
54 Features
54 Overall
54
86 Imaging
57 Features
60 Overall
58
Sony A390 vs Sony NEX-F3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 549g - 128 x 97 x 86mm
- Introduced July 2010
- Superseded the Sony A380
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 16000
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony E Mount
- 314g - 117 x 67 x 42mm
- Launched August 2012
- Old Model is Sony NEX-C3
- New Model is Sony NEX-3N
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Sony A390 vs Sony NEX-F3 Overview
Following is a thorough assessment of the Sony A390 versus Sony NEX-F3, former is a Entry-Level DSLR while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and both are offered by Sony. The image resolution of the A390 (14MP) and the NEX-F3 (16MP) is fairly close and both cameras boast the identical sensor measurements (APS-C).
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe A390 was brought out 3 years earlier than the NEX-F3 which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Sony A390 being a Compact SLR camera and the Sony NEX-F3 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before getting into a more detailed comparison, here is a quick synopsis of how the A390 grades against the NEX-F3 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Sony A390 vs Sony NEX-F3 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Sony Alpha DSLR-A390 & Sony Alpha NEX-F3. The entire galleries are available at Sony A390 Gallery & Sony NEX-F3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Sony A390 over the Sony NEX-F3
| A390 | NEX-F3 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Sony NEX-F3 over the Sony A390
| NEX-F3 | A390 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | August 2012 |  | July 2010 | More modern by 25 months |
| Display size | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Sony A390 and Sony NEX-F3
| A390 | NEX-F3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Very precise focusing | ||
| Display type | Tilting |  | Tilting | Tilting display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither has selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither has Touch display |
Sony A390 vs Sony NEX-F3 Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to carry around your camera, you're going to have to factor its weight and volume. The Sony A390 has outer measurements of 128mm x 97mm x 86mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 3.4") having a weight of 549 grams (1.21 lbs) while the Sony NEX-F3 has sizing of 117mm x 67mm x 42mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.7") and a weight of 314 grams (0.69 lbs).
Analyze the Sony A390 versus Sony NEX-F3 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are working with at that moment. The following is a front view measurements comparison of the A390 vs the NEX-F3.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the A390 and NEX-F3 is 66 and 86 respectively.
Sony A390 vs Sony NEX-F3 Sensor Comparison
Usually, its difficult to visualise the difference in sensor sizes purely by viewing technical specs. The pic underneath may offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the A390 and NEX-F3.
As you have seen, each of these cameras feature the identical sensor size but not the same megapixels. You can anticipate the Sony NEX-F3 to render extra detail having its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop images way more aggressively. The more aged A390 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
Sony A390 vs Sony NEX-F3 Screen and ViewFinder
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixelsLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Sony A390 vs Sony NEX-F3 Specifications
| Sony Alpha DSLR-A390 | Sony Alpha NEX-F3 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Sony | Sony |
| Model type | Sony Alpha DSLR-A390 | Sony Alpha NEX-F3 |
| Category | Entry-Level DSLR | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
| Introduced | 2010-07-28 | 2012-08-16 |
| Body design | Compact SLR | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Bionz | Bionz |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | APS-C | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 23.5 x 15.7mm | 23.4 x 15.6mm |
| Sensor area | 369.0mm² | 365.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4592 x 3056 | 4912 x 3264 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 16000 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 200 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | 25 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | Sony/Minolta Alpha | Sony E |
| Available lenses | 143 | 121 |
| Crop factor | 1.5 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Tilting | Tilting |
| Display size | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 230k dot | 920k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Display technology | - | TFT Xtra Fine LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | Electronic (optional) |
| Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.49x | - |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 30s | 30s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 3.0fps | 6.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 10.00 m (at ISO 100) | - |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Wireless | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash sync | 1/160s | 1/160s |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (60, 24 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 549 gr (1.21 lb) | 314 gr (0.69 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 128 x 97 x 86mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 3.4") | 117 x 67 x 42mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | 66 | 73 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 22.5 | 22.7 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 11.5 | 12.3 |
| DXO Low light rating | 607 | 1114 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 230 photographs | 470 photographs |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-FH50 | NPFW50 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec 3 or 5 images) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/ SDHC, Memory Stick Pro Duo | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at launch | $500 | $470 |
