Olympus TG-870 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
91 Imaging
41 Features
46 Overall
43
77 Imaging
52 Features
31 Overall
43
Olympus TG-870 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400 (Bump to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 221g - 113 x 64 x 28mm
- Revealed January 2016
- Succeeded the Olympus TG-860
(Full Review)
- 12MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 50mm (F2.5) lens
- 453g - 114 x 70 x 77mm
- Introduced November 2009
Olympus TG-870 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Overview
Let's examine more closely at the Olympus TG-870 and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro, one being a Ultracompact and the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by companies Olympus and Ricoh. There is a huge difference between the sensor resolutions of the TG-870 (16MP) and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (12MP) and the TG-870 (1/2.3") and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (APS-C) come with totally different sensor sizing.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe TG-870 was announced 6 years later than the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and that is quite a significant gap as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras offer different body type with the Olympus TG-870 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before getting through a in-depth comparison, below is a short highlight of how the TG-870 grades versus the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus TG-870 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro. The whole galleries are available at Olympus TG-870 Gallery and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-870 over the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
TG-870 | GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2016 | November 2009 | More recent by 75 months | |
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen resolution | 921k | 920k | Crisper screen (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro over the Olympus TG-870
GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | TG-870 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Dial accurate focus |
Common features in the Olympus TG-870 and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
TG-870 | GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent screen measurement | |
Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Missing Touch friendly screen |
Olympus TG-870 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to lug around your camera frequently, you should factor in its weight and volume. The Olympus TG-870 offers physical dimensions of 113mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs) and the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro has sizing of 114mm x 70mm x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") with a weight of 453 grams (1.00 lbs).
Check out the Olympus TG-870 and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are utilising at that time. Below is the front view overall size comparison of the TG-870 against the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the TG-870 and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro is 91 and 77 respectively.
Olympus TG-870 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is very difficult to visualise the difference between sensor measurements merely by looking at a spec sheet. The photograph here may provide you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the TG-870 and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro.
As you can see, each of these cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The TG-870 having a tinier sensor will make achieving shallow depth of field trickier and the Olympus TG-870 will resolve more detail with its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop pictures far more aggressively. The more recent TG-870 will have an edge with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus TG-870 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus TG-870 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Specifications
Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 | Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 | Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro |
Category | Ultracompact | Advanced Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2016-01-06 | 2009-11-10 |
Physical type | Ultracompact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic VII | GR engine III |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.6 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 370.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 12MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 2848 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Maximum boosted ISO | 12800 | - |
Minimum native ISO | 125 | 200 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 21-105mm (5.0x) | 50mm (1x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.7 | f/2.5 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 921 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 180s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/3200s |
Continuous shooting rate | 7.0fps | 3.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 4.00 m (at ISO 1600) | 3.00 m |
Flash options | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, off, LED illuminator | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (60p) | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 221 gr (0.49 pounds) | 453 gr (1.00 pounds) |
Dimensions | 113 x 64 x 28mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.1") | 114 x 70 x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 photos | 320 photos |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | Li-50B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch price | $280 | $566 |