Olympus TG-870 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
91 Imaging
40 Features
46 Overall
42
69 Imaging
56 Features
45 Overall
51
Olympus TG-870 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 125 - 6400 (Expand to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 221g - 113 x 64 x 28mm
- Announced January 2016
- Succeeded the Olympus TG-860
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-85mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 550g - 114 x 75 x 93mm
- Released February 2012
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus TG-870 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Overview
Here, we are looking at the Olympus TG-870 versus Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5, former is a Ultracompact while the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by competitors Olympus and Ricoh. The sensor resolution of the TG-870 (16MP) and the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 (16MP) is fairly comparable but the TG-870 (1/2.3") and GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 (APS-C) have different sensor sizes.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe TG-870 was introduced 3 years after the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 which is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras feature different body design with the Olympus TG-870 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before getting right into a detailed comparison, here is a short view of how the TG-870 matches up against the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus TG-870 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 & Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5. The whole galleries are available at Olympus TG-870 Gallery & Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-870 over the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
| TG-870 | GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2016 | February 2012 | More modern by 48 months | |
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
| Display resolution | 921k | 920k | Sharper display (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 over the Olympus TG-870
| GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 | TG-870 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Very exact focus |
Common features in the Olympus TG-870 and Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
| TG-870 | GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display size | 3" | 3" | Same display dimensions | |
| Selfie screen | Neither offers selfie screen | |||
| Touch display | Neither offers Touch display |
Olympus TG-870 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to carry around your camera, you're going to have to factor in its weight and size. The Olympus TG-870 offers external dimensions of 113mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.1") with a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs) and the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 has specifications of 114mm x 75mm x 93mm (4.5" x 3.0" x 3.7") along with a weight of 550 grams (1.21 lbs).
See the Olympus TG-870 versus Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you have chosen at the time. Below is a front view dimension comparison of the TG-870 compared to the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5.

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the TG-870 and GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 is 91 and 69 respectively.
Olympus TG-870 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is very hard to picture the gap in sensor sizes only by checking out technical specs. The picture underneath should give you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the TG-870 and GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5.
As you can tell, the 2 cameras feature the identical megapixel count but different sensor sizes. The TG-870 provides the smaller sensor which is going to make obtaining shallow depth of field harder. The more recent TG-870 provides an advantage when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus TG-870 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Olympus TG-870 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Specifications
| Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 | Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model type | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 | Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 |
| Type | Ultracompact | Advanced Mirrorless |
| Announced | 2016-01-06 | 2012-02-02 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | TruePic VII | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.6 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 370.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4928 x 3264 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Maximum boosted ISO | 12800 | - |
| Minimum native ISO | 125 | 200 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 21-105mm (5.0x) | 24-85mm (3.5x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.7 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 921k dot | 920k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Display technology | - | TFT color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 180s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/3200s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 7.0fps | 3.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.00 m (at ISO 1600) | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, off, LED illuminator | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (60p) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 221 grams (0.49 lb) | 550 grams (1.21 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 113 x 64 x 28mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.1") | 114 x 75 x 93mm (4.5" x 3.0" x 3.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 photographs | 400 photographs |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | Li-50B | DB-90 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD/SDHC, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at launch | $280 | $871 |