Olympus TG-870 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
91 Imaging
40 Features
46 Overall
42
85 Imaging
33 Features
44 Overall
37
Olympus TG-870 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 125 - 6400 (Bump to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 221g - 113 x 64 x 28mm
- Launched January 2016
- Old Model is Olympus TG-860
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-72mm (F2.5-4.4) lens
- 355g - 114 x 70 x 44mm
- Launched March 2010
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus TG-870 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Overview
Below is a detailed analysis of the Olympus TG-870 and Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC, former being a Ultracompact while the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by rivals Olympus and Ricoh. There exists a noticeable gap among the image resolutions of the TG-870 (16MP) and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (10MP) and the TG-870 (1/2.3") and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (1/1.7") possess different sensor measurements.
Photography GlossaryThe TG-870 was released 5 years later than the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras offer different body type with the Olympus TG-870 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before going straight into a in depth comparison, below is a concise introduction of how the TG-870 scores versus the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus TG-870 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 & Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC. The complete galleries are available at Olympus TG-870 Gallery & Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-870 over the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
| TG-870 | GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2016 |  | March 2010 | More recent by 71 months |
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting screen |
| Screen resolution | 921k |  | 920k | Crisper screen (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC over the Olympus TG-870
| GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | TG-870 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Very precise focusing |
Common features in the Olympus TG-870 and Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
| TG-870 | GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent screen measurements |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Missing Touch screen |
Olympus TG-870 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to lug around your camera, you're going to have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus TG-870 offers outer dimensions of 113mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.1") having a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs) while the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC has dimensions of 114mm x 70mm x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") with a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs).
Check the Olympus TG-870 and Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you have attached during that time. Here is the front view physical size comparison of the TG-870 versus the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the TG-870 and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC is 91 and 85 respectively.
Olympus TG-870 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Sensor Comparison
Typically, it's difficult to picture the contrast in sensor measurements only by seeing technical specs. The visual below will offer you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the TG-870 and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC.
As you can tell, both of those cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The TG-870 featuring a smaller sensor is going to make getting bokeh more challenging and the Olympus TG-870 will show extra detail as a result of its extra 6MP. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop pictures a little more aggressively. The more recent TG-870 provides an edge with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus TG-870 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Olympus TG-870 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Specifications
| Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 | Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 | Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC |
| Type | Ultracompact | Advanced Mirrorless |
| Launched | 2016-01-06 | 2010-03-18 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic VII | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 10MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Maximum boosted ISO | 12800 | - |
| Lowest native ISO | 125 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 21-105mm (5.0x) | 24-72mm (3.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.5-5.7 | f/2.5-4.4 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 4.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 921k dot | 920k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 180 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 7.0 frames per sec | 2.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.00 m (at ISO 1600) | 4.50 m |
| Flash options | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, off, LED illuminator | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (60p) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 221 grams (0.49 pounds) | 355 grams (0.78 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 113 x 64 x 28mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.1") | 114 x 70 x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 pictures | 410 pictures |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | Li-50B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD/SDHC, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Retail price | $280 | $349 |