Olympus TG-870 vs Samsung DV300F
91 Imaging
40 Features
46 Overall
42
96 Imaging
39 Features
33 Overall
36
Olympus TG-870 vs Samsung DV300F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400 (Bump to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 221g - 113 x 64 x 28mm
- Introduced January 2016
- Old Model is Olympus TG-860
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-125mm (F2.5-6.3) lens
- 133g - 95 x 57 x 18mm
- Released January 2012
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus TG-870 vs Samsung DV300F Overview
Following is a thorough analysis of the Olympus TG-870 versus Samsung DV300F, former is a Ultracompact while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Olympus and Samsung. The resolution of the TG-870 (16MP) and the DV300F (16MP) is pretty similar and they enjoy the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe TG-870 was launched 4 years after the DV300F which is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus TG-870 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung DV300F being a Compact camera.
Before we go straight into a comprehensive comparison, below is a simple overview of how the TG-870 grades vs the DV300F in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus TG-870 vs Samsung DV300F Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 & Samsung DV300F. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus TG-870 Gallery & Samsung DV300F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-870 over the Samsung DV300F
| TG-870 | DV300F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2016 | January 2012 | More modern by 49 months | |
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
| Screen resolution | 921k | 460k | Sharper screen (+461k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung DV300F over the Olympus TG-870
| DV300F | TG-870 |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus TG-870 and Samsung DV300F
| TG-870 | DV300F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | No manual focus | |||
| Screen dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical screen size | |
| Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Absent Touch friendly screen |
Olympus TG-870 vs Samsung DV300F Physical Comparison
If you're going to carry around your camera often, you have to think about its weight and volume. The Olympus TG-870 has outside measurements of 113mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.1") with a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs) whilst the Samsung DV300F has sizing of 95mm x 57mm x 18mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") with a weight of 133 grams (0.29 lbs).
Look at the Olympus TG-870 versus Samsung DV300F in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are using at that time. The following is the front view over all size comparison of the TG-870 vs the DV300F.

Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the TG-870 and DV300F is 91 and 96 respectively.
Olympus TG-870 vs Samsung DV300F Sensor Comparison
Normally, its hard to visualise the gap between sensor sizes simply by going over specs. The pic below should provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the TG-870 and DV300F.
All in all, both the cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements and the same resolution so you can expect similar quality of photos though you may want to consider the launch date of the products into consideration. The newer TG-870 is going to have an advantage with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus TG-870 vs Samsung DV300F Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Olympus TG-870 vs Samsung DV300F Specifications
| Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 | Samsung DV300F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 | Samsung DV300F |
| Type | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2016-01-06 | 2012-01-02 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | TruePic VII | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Maximum boosted ISO | 12800 | - |
| Minimum native ISO | 125 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 21-105mm (5.0x) | 25-125mm (5.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.5-5.7 | f/2.5-6.3 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 921k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen technology | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 16 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 7.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.00 m (at ISO 1600) | 4.10 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, off, LED illuminator | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (60p) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | Optional |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 221 gr (0.49 lbs) | 133 gr (0.29 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 113 x 64 x 28mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.1") | 95 x 57 x 18mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 shots | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | Li-50B | BP88 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at launch | $280 | $200 |