Olympus TG-870 vs Samsung GX-20
91 Imaging
41 Features
46 Overall
43
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/98cb4/98cb42e909dff8452621d79a82a9f24270e5e01f" alt="Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 front Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a5098/a50987fbe1d3aed59d1942e6a355078ee6cfb4f2" alt="Samsung GX-20 front Samsung GX-20 front"
58 Imaging
53 Features
52 Overall
52
Olympus TG-870 vs Samsung GX-20 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400 (Push to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 221g - 113 x 64 x 28mm
- Launched January 2016
- Succeeded the Olympus TG-860
(Full Review)
- 15MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Push to 6400)
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Pentax KAF2 Mount
- 800g - 142 x 101 x 72mm
- Launched January 2008
- Superseded the Samsung GX-10
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus TG-870 vs Samsung GX-20 Overview
Let's take a more detailed look at the Olympus TG-870 vs Samsung GX-20, one is a Ultracompact and the latter is a Advanced DSLR by companies Olympus and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the TG-870 (16MP) and the GX-20 (15MP) is relatively comparable but the TG-870 (1/2.3") and GX-20 (APS-C) offer different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
The TG-870 was brought out 8 years after the GX-20 which is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus TG-870 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung GX-20 being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before diving right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a simple synopsis of how the TG-870 matches up versus the GX-20 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus TG-870 vs Samsung GX-20 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 and Samsung GX-20. The entire galleries are available at Olympus TG-870 Gallery and Samsung GX-20 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-870 over the Samsung GX-20
TG-870 | GX-20 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2016 | ![]() | January 2008 | More modern by 97 months |
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 921k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper screen (+691k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung GX-20 over the Olympus TG-870
GX-20 | TG-870 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial precise focusing |
Common features in the Olympus TG-870 and Samsung GX-20
TG-870 | GX-20 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | ![]() | No selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | No Touch friendly screen |
Olympus TG-870 vs Samsung GX-20 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to carry around your camera often, you will need to factor its weight and size. The Olympus TG-870 features exterior dimensions of 113mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.1") and a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs) while the Samsung GX-20 has specifications of 142mm x 101mm x 72mm (5.6" x 4.0" x 2.8") accompanied by a weight of 800 grams (1.76 lbs).
See the Olympus TG-870 vs Samsung GX-20 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you have attached at that moment. Below is a front view proportions comparison of the TG-870 compared to the GX-20.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/36ac5/36ac5d4128c85bfc27bf5c4cdfc3a383436a1ebb" alt="Olympus TG-870 vs Samsung GX-20 size comparison Olympus TG-870 vs Samsung GX-20 size comparison"
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the TG-870 and GX-20 is 91 and 58 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f8f12/f8f1252549539c17fbe06c2c77bfbeaaded9bd2a" alt="Olympus TG-870 vs Samsung GX-20 top view buttons comparison Olympus TG-870 vs Samsung GX-20 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus TG-870 vs Samsung GX-20 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is very tough to picture the difference in sensor sizes purely by going through specs. The picture here will help provide you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the TG-870 and GX-20.
All in all, each of these cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The TG-870 featuring a smaller sensor is going to make shooting shallow depth of field more challenging and the Olympus TG-870 will show greater detail having its extra 1MP. Higher resolution will also let you crop shots way more aggressively. The more modern TG-870 should have an edge in sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/138ef/138ef56c8086c2fc3f377b0cbefa26c2d89a3968" alt="Olympus TG-870 vs Samsung GX-20 sensor size comparison Olympus TG-870 vs Samsung GX-20 sensor size comparison"
Olympus TG-870 vs Samsung GX-20 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2d9c4/2d9c42d816818439a1ecc95c763256c23f12eaa6" alt="Olympus TG-870 vs Samsung GX-20 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus TG-870 vs Samsung GX-20 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus TG-870 vs Samsung GX-20 Specifications
Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 | Samsung GX-20 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Samsung |
Model | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 | Samsung GX-20 |
Type | Ultracompact | Advanced DSLR |
Launched | 2016-01-06 | 2008-01-24 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic VII | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.4 x 15.6mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 365.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 15 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4688 x 3120 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Highest enhanced ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 125 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Pentax KAF2 |
Lens focal range | 21-105mm (5.0x) | - |
Highest aperture | f/3.5-5.7 | - |
Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
Available lenses | - | 151 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
Screen resolution | 921 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 95% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.64x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 7.0 frames/s | 3.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 4.00 m (at ISO 1600) | 13.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash settings | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, off, LED illuminator | Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain, wireless |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | - | 1/180 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (60p) | - |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 221 grams (0.49 pounds) | 800 grams (1.76 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 113 x 64 x 28mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.1") | 142 x 101 x 72mm (5.6" x 4.0" x 2.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 68 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 23.1 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.2 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 714 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 images | - |
Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | Li-50B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD/MMC/SDHC card |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at release | $280 | $850 |