Olympus TG-870 vs Samsung ST150F
91 Imaging
40 Features
46 Overall
42
96 Imaging
39 Features
30 Overall
35
Olympus TG-870 vs Samsung ST150F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 125 - 6400 (Boost to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 221g - 113 x 64 x 28mm
- Released January 2016
- Replaced the Olympus TG-860
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-125mm (F2.5-6.3) lens
- 114g - 94 x 58 x 18mm
- Launched January 2013
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus TG-870 vs Samsung ST150F Overview
Following is a in depth assessment of the Olympus TG-870 and Samsung ST150F, former is a Ultracompact while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Olympus and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the TG-870 (16MP) and the ST150F (16MP) is very well matched and both cameras provide the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe TG-870 was announced 3 years after the ST150F which is quite a sizable difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus TG-870 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung ST150F being a Compact camera.
Before we go straight to a in depth comparison, here is a quick synopsis of how the TG-870 matches up against the ST150F with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus TG-870 vs Samsung ST150F Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 & Samsung ST150F. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus TG-870 Gallery & Samsung ST150F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-870 over the Samsung ST150F
| TG-870 | ST150F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2016 | January 2013 | More modern by 37 months | |
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
| Display resolution | 921k | 230k | Clearer display (+691k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung ST150F over the Olympus TG-870
| ST150F | TG-870 |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus TG-870 and Samsung ST150F
| TG-870 | ST150F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | No manual focus | |||
| Display size | 3" | 3" | Same display sizing | |
| Selfie screen | No selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly display | Neither contains Touch friendly display |
Olympus TG-870 vs Samsung ST150F Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to carry around your camera frequently, you will need to think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus TG-870 has got physical measurements of 113mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.1") along with a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs) and the Samsung ST150F has dimensions of 94mm x 58mm x 18mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 0.7") with a weight of 114 grams (0.25 lbs).
Look at the Olympus TG-870 and Samsung ST150F in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you choose at that time. The following is a front view dimensions comparison of the TG-870 against the ST150F.

Using size and weight, the portability score of the TG-870 and ST150F is 91 and 96 respectively.
Olympus TG-870 vs Samsung ST150F Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is hard to visualise the gap between sensor sizes just by checking a spec sheet. The image here will help offer you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the TG-870 and ST150F.
As you can see, the two cameras come with the identical sensor size and the exact same megapixels so you can expect similar quality of photographs but you might want to factor the age of the products into consideration. The fresher TG-870 will have an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus TG-870 vs Samsung ST150F Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Olympus TG-870 vs Samsung ST150F Specifications
| Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 | Samsung ST150F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model type | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 | Samsung ST150F |
| Category | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2016-01-06 | 2013-01-07 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic VII | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Highest boosted ISO | 12800 | - |
| Min native ISO | 125 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 21-105mm (5.0x) | 25-125mm (5.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.5-5.7 | f/2.5-6.3 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 921k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Display technology | - | QVGA TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 1 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 7.0 frames per second | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.00 m (at ISO 1600) | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, off, LED illuminator | - |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (60p) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 221g (0.49 lbs) | 114g (0.25 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 113 x 64 x 28mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.1") | 94 x 58 x 18mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 photographs | - |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | Li-50B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) | Yes |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | microSD/microSDHC/microSDXC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Retail cost | $280 | $300 |