Olympus TG-870 vs Samsung TL205
Portability
91 Imaging
41 Features
46 Overall
43
91 Imaging
41 Features
46 Overall
43
Portability
94 Imaging
35 Features
17 Overall
27
94 Imaging
35 Features
17 Overall
27
Olympus TG-870 vs Samsung TL205 Key Specs
Olympus TG-870
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400 (Push to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 221g - 113 x 64 x 28mm
- Released January 2016
- Succeeded the Olympus TG-860
Samsung TL205
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-105mm (F3.0-5.6) lens
- 177g - 99 x 59 x 20mm
- Revealed January 2010
- Other Name is PL100
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus TG-870 vs Samsung TL205 Overview
In this write-up, we will be comparing the Olympus TG-870 versus Samsung TL205, both Ultracompact digital cameras by rivals Olympus and Samsung. There exists a sizeable gap between the image resolutions of the TG-870 (16MP) and TL205 (12MP) but they possess the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe TG-870 was revealed 6 years after the TL205 which is quite a large gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras offer the identical body type (Ultracompact).
Before getting in to a in depth comparison, below is a short view of how the TG-870 matches up against the TL205 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus TG-870 vs Samsung TL205 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 and Samsung TL205. The full galleries are provided at Olympus TG-870 Gallery and Samsung TL205 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-870 over the Samsung TL205
| TG-870 | TL205 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2016 |  | January 2010 | More modern by 74 months |
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting screen |
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 921k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+691k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung TL205 over the Olympus TG-870
| TL205 | TG-870 |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus TG-870 and Samsung TL205
| TG-870 | TL205 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | No manual focus | ||
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither includes Touch screen |
Olympus TG-870 vs Samsung TL205 Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to carry around your camera regularly, you will want to think about its weight and proportions. The Olympus TG-870 features outside dimensions of 113mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.1") and a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs) while the Samsung TL205 has measurements of 99mm x 59mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.8") with a weight of 177 grams (0.39 lbs).
Check out the Olympus TG-870 versus Samsung TL205 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you have at that moment. Following is the front view dimension comparison of the TG-870 vs the TL205.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the TG-870 and TL205 is 91 and 94 respectively.
Olympus TG-870 vs Samsung TL205 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is very tough to visualise the gap between sensor sizes purely by going over specifications. The image underneath will help offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the TG-870 and TL205.
To sum up, each of the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same MP. You should expect the Olympus TG-870 to deliver extra detail because of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will enable you to crop photographs far more aggressively. The younger TG-870 will have an edge with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus TG-870 vs Samsung TL205 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Olympus TG-870 Portrait photography features
Samsung TL205 Portrait photography features
good MP (16 megapixels)
has face detection autofocus
lack of manual focus
no manual control
can't use external flash
small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
focusing manually not possible
no manual mode
no external flash support
sensor resolution not great (12 megapixels)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Olympus TG-870 Street photography factors
Samsung TL205 Street photography factors
screen tilts up and down
built in image stabilization (Optical)
environment sealing
small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
heavier than average (221 grams)
screen is fixed
no image stabilization
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
heavier than competition in class (177g)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Sports photography with Olympus TG-870
Sports photography with Samsung TL205
built in image stabilization (Optical)
good MP (16MP)
has tracking autofocus
environment sealing
great battery (300 CIPA)
no shutter priority
small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect autofocus
features tracking focus
no shutter priority mode
no image stabilization
sensor resolution not great (12 megapixels)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
has no phase detect autofocus
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Olympus TG-870 Travel photography highlights
Samsung TL205 Travel photography highlights
great battery (300 CIPA)
environment sealing
good MP (16 megapixels)
built-in flash
fairly wide (21mm)
heavier than average (221g)
doesn't have selfie friendly display
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
built-in flash
does not have Time Lapse mode
heavier than competition in class (177g)
sensor resolution not great (12MP)
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
wide angle not good (35mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.0)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Olympus TG-870 Landscape photography factors
Samsung TL205 Landscape photography factors
fairly wide (21mm)
nice screen size (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
good MP (16MP)
environment sealing
great battery (300 CIPA)
lack of manual focus
cannot switch lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
no manual control
small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
focusing manually not possible
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not good (35mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.0)
screen is somewhat small (2.7 inch)
no manual mode
no image stabilization
sensor resolution not great (12MP)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
does not have Time Lapse mode
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Olympus TG-870 Vlogging highlights
Samsung TL205 Vlogging highlights
fairly wide (21mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
has face detection autofocus
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
doesn't have selfie friendly display
missing external mic jack
heavier than average (221g)
wide angle not good (35mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.0)
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
no image stabilization
low video resolution (1280 x 720 resolution)
does not have mic support
heavier than competition in class (177 grams)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Olympus TG-870 vs Samsung TL205 Specifications
| Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 | Samsung TL205 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 | Samsung TL205 |
| Alternate name | - | PL100 |
| Type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Released | 2016-01-06 | 2010-01-06 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | TruePic VII | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 12MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Max boosted ISO | 12800 | - |
| Minimum native ISO | 125 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 21-105mm (5.0x) | 35-105mm (3.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.5-5.7 | f/3.0-5.6 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 10cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Screen resolution | 921 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1500 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 7.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.00 m (at ISO 1600) | 3.40 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, off, LED illuminator | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (60p) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 221g (0.49 lb) | 177g (0.39 lb) |
| Dimensions | 113 x 64 x 28mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.1") | 99 x 59 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 photographs | - |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | Li-50B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, SD/SDHC Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at launch | $280 | $180 |