Olympus TG-870 vs Sony A7c
91 Imaging
41 Features
46 Overall
43
78 Imaging
76 Features
88 Overall
80
Olympus TG-870 vs Sony A7c Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400 (Raise to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 221g - 113 x 64 x 28mm
- Launched January 2016
- Previous Model is Olympus TG-860
(Full Review)
- 24MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 51200 (Push to 204800)
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Sony E Mount
- 509g - 124 x 71 x 60mm
- Introduced September 2020
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus TG-870 vs Sony A7c Overview
In this write-up, we are evaluating the Olympus TG-870 vs Sony A7c, former is a Ultracompact while the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by companies Olympus and Sony. There is a large difference between the image resolutions of the TG-870 (16MP) and A7c (24MP) and the TG-870 (1/2.3") and A7c (Full frame) possess different sensor size.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe TG-870 was manufactured 5 years earlier than the A7c which is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus TG-870 being a Ultracompact camera and the Sony A7c being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before delving through a thorough comparison, below is a quick summary of how the TG-870 scores vs the A7c when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus TG-870 vs Sony A7c Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 & Sony Alpha A7c. The entire galleries are available at Olympus TG-870 Gallery & Sony A7c Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-870 over the Sony A7c
| TG-870 | A7c |
|---|
Reasons to pick Sony A7c over the Olympus TG-870
| A7c | TG-870 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | September 2020 |  | January 2016 | More modern by 57 months |
| Focus manually |  | More accurate focusing | ||
| Display type | Fully articulated |  | Tilting | Fully Articulating display |
| Display resolution | 922k |  | 921k | Crisper display (+1k dot) |
| Selfie screen |  | Easy selfies | ||
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus TG-870 and Sony A7c
| TG-870 | A7c | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent display size |
Olympus TG-870 vs Sony A7c Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to carry around your camera regularly, you need to take into account its weight and measurements. The Olympus TG-870 enjoys physical measurements of 113mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.1") along with a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs) whilst the Sony A7c has proportions of 124mm x 71mm x 60mm (4.9" x 2.8" x 2.4") accompanied by a weight of 509 grams (1.12 lbs).
Check the Olympus TG-870 vs Sony A7c in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. Here is the front view over all size comparison of the TG-870 vs the A7c.
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the TG-870 and A7c is 91 and 78 respectively.
Olympus TG-870 vs Sony A7c Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, its hard to visualize the gap between sensor sizes purely by reading through specifications. The picture here will provide you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the TG-870 and A7c.
To sum up, both the cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The TG-870 due to its tinier sensor is going to make shooting bokeh tougher and the Sony A7c will resolve more detail due to its extra 8 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop images a little more aggressively. The more aged TG-870 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus TG-870 vs Sony A7c Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Olympus TG-870 vs Sony A7c Specifications
| Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 | Sony Alpha A7c | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Sony |
| Model | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 | Sony Alpha A7c |
| Category | Ultracompact | Advanced Mirrorless |
| Launched | 2016-01-06 | 2020-09-14 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic VII | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Full frame |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 35.8 x 23.8mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 852.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 24MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 6000 x 4000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 51200 |
| Maximum enhanced ISO | 12800 | 204800 |
| Min native ISO | 125 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Min enhanced ISO | - | 50 |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 693 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | Sony E |
| Lens focal range | 21-105mm (5.0x) | - |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.7 | - |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
| Total lenses | - | 122 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 1 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Tilting | Fully articulated |
| Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 921k dots | 922k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360k dots |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.59x |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Max silent shutter speed | - | 1/8000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 7.0 frames per second | 10.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.00 m (at ISO 1600) | no built-in flash |
| Flash modes | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, off, LED illuminator | no built-in flash |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (60p) | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 100 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, XAVC S, H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 3.2 Gen 1 (5 GBit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 221g (0.49 pounds) | 509g (1.12 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 113 x 64 x 28mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.1") | 124 x 71 x 60mm (4.9" x 2.8" x 2.4") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 pictures | 740 pictures |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | Li-50B | NP-FZ100 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec; continuous (3 or 5 exposures)) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-II supported) |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at release | $280 | $1,800 |